• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I tried Endeavour and Garuda, and they’re bad for me exactly the way Arch is - it’s a bit too bleeding-edge to run exactly as stable as I imagine my perfect system to be, and it’s also too easy to shoot yourself in the foot. It sure is possible to run it smoothly, but that requires a lot of user attention and consideration with updates and tools.

    The premise of Manjaro is good - like, let the packets go through some testing before being delivered to a wide audience, this is pretty much common sense. Should they implement something like Chaotic-AUR, but with the delay for dependencies to catch up, AUR could actually work for most of its purposes. Combine that with more careful considerations here and there, and you might get your perfect Arch.

    That said, I strongly prefer distros based on Debian (except Ubuntu and its derivatives) or Arch, as they are the only major community-driven options that are not exotic and obscure. Debian is too slow, Arch is too fast, and there’s little in between, which is my personal frustration. For now, the Arch edge was closer to my spirit, but the only sane premise on that front, Manjaro, is essentially even less stable than plain Arch in the long run. So…neither works, and I reluctantly go Fedora.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Slowroll is certainly on my radar, but as things stand, there are two things that are stopping me:

        1. It’s still experimental and it does break, which ruins the premise of stability
        2. It is not community-driven, which, while not being a total dealbreaker, is considered by me to be negative

        Thanks for the suggestion, though!