This is a twofer:

  1. The article itself
  2. HN’s take on it
  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    I love that video because until I watched it, I didn’t realise how much of a thing it was. Physics seems to be a magnet for the “iamverysmart” types; I feel sorry for actual physicists

    • rook@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Remember that actual physicists can fall into the same trap, and believe themselves to be very smart too. Plenty suffer an irresistible urge to fix every other field that’s doing it wrong.

      As an alternative to the various xkcds on the subject, have an smbc instead.

      https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2012-03-21

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, quite. As a scientist (biochemistry), I sometimes have to catch myself on this too.

        A tension that I see within the sciences and beyond is not sufficiently factoring in how good communication is essential to good research. Some of my peers disagree with me vehemently here, arguing that good research is good research regardless of one’s ability (or willingness) to dress up said research with pretty words, but I argue that the whole point of publishing papers or going to conferences is because science relies on communicating our research. I see a weird amount of hostility directed towards scientists who branch out into science communication. I speculate that an analogue of the “physicist instinct” is at the core of this — a disregard of the skill involved in interdisciplinary research, and an unwillingness to recognise how situated one’s own knowledge is.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It is a field that attracts a lot of cranks (who are pretty recognizable as being cranks via various patterns). Being a well known physicist must be hell.

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Back when I was an undergrad I saw a letter addressed to the department from a German gentleman who claimed to have invented a perpetual motion machine (this was the department of mechanics). I remember the letter being quite typographically florid and especially the author’s likeness in silhouette.

        My advisor had fun finding the flaw in the proposal. Took a few minutes.

        I often wondered if demolishing a PM suggestion would be a good extra credit question on an exam.

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        You don’t even have to be well-known to get crank attention. Post anything with “quantum” in the title on the arXiv and they’ll find your e-mail.

        Source: this is one of the few times when I can say “trust me, bro” and be entirely sincere about it