Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it’s an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      These are useful data for making decisions about using their service, but not exactly indicative of support for a right wing authoritarian leader who lies more in one day than he has hairs on his entire body.

      Edit: typo

        • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          9 months ago

          that’s why I opened with “I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall.”

          Damn; you’re right. My bad. I somehow missed your opener saying exactly the opposite of what you were saying.

          Everything you said is true and verifiable, and worth considering when you decide which service to use. It’s a lot of reasons to favor the .onion/tor version of their service to limit what they have access to depending on your privacy stance.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      Woah… an actually rock-solid account of problems with Proton! Nicely done.

      This contrasts with the incoherent conspiracy theory spaghetti that has sometimes been trotted out to make the case against them.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is interesting. I’m current using btguard, but was thinking about other vpn providers. I have a free protonmail email account and was wondering about their vpn service. Sounds like they are not so privacy oriented. And I assume NordVPN is a similar story?

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      1,2 and 3 are completely irrelevant. 1 is completely normal, 2 missed the point that the wallet (which I don’t use, I never owned crypto) has nothing to do with privacy and 4 is an optional marketing strategy to incentivise migration from google. Nothing is wrong with any of this.