The planet’s average temperature hit 17.23 degrees Celsius on Thursday, surpassing the 17.18C record set on Tuesday and equalled on Wednesday.

      • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        About 15 years ago I was going somewhere with my family. Stepmom and I were talking about Climate Change then, how if things didn’t change that massive starvation was likely, that crazed weather would be irreversible, etc. and she noticed that my 10 year old niece’s eyes were getting huge. She was genuinely disturbed by the conversation and began to say is this really going to happen? Before I could plainly reply my stepmom reassured her that no, things were going to be fine, and we changed the subject.

        Niece is in mid twenties now and subject to the reality of the situation as it slowly unfolds, like an asteroid headed toward the earth at 5 mph. The future is dreadful to her.

  • CeeBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s important to note that this also coincides with the start of what’s predicted to be a super El Nino (we’ve had a couple of those already). If the model holds true then 2024 will be even hotter than this year, and (again, if the model predictions are right) will shatter all previous records. Then come 2025 or 2026 average temperatures will settle down a bit.

    The issue isn’t the seasonal or even the yearly hottest temps. It’s the overall trend that’s a concern (which is what the article is talking about), which are trending up.

    Not sure if any of that made sense.

    • zombuey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      right so considering we’ve been seeing alarming loss of ice mass over the last couple of years and we know that has an exponential effect on climate change. We already hit the tipping point just most people didn’t realize it.

    • KickyMcAssington@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Makes sense, but the idea of a “super” El Nino is a symptom of the same problem. Super implies unusual or abnormal, and it’s only getting worse.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yes, the super El Nino’s are part of climate change. They are getting worse each time. All I was saying is that it’s not a straight year over year increase. It comes in waves or heaves in a periodic manner.

  • electriccars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I used to worry about this a lot, I still do but I used to too.

    Joking aside, it’s a shit show that us plebians can’t really do anything about but I still try. I’ve driven a hybrid for the last 6 years, I have a smart thermostat to try to save energy, I try to eat less meat more often. I recycle a lot more than most. I even make my own bread and nut milks and many other things which is not only cheaper and healthier (and WAY more delicious) but requires less transport related greenhouse gas emissions than buying premade breads and nut milks. Nut milk is especially better than dairy milk in that matter.

    Oh yeah! And yesterday I picked up 10 large trash bags of litter: yesterday picked up 10 large kitchen trash bags

    • VaidenKelsier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro you’re doing more than most of us, thank you.

      But yeah, our carbon footprint is minuscule in comparison to corporate footprints. We need them to fucking play ball.

      What’s more profitable: Exceptional profits for 30 years until civilization collapses, or sustainable profits forever?

      • Wrench Wizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        All I could think about when reading this post is corporate footprints. It’s great for us to all do our part, but sadly the corporations not doing their part is screwing everybody. We need more regulations on them, idc what product they’re making or how much profit they’d like or even how many people whine about not receiving that product it needs to stop.

        • ikiru@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, corporate footprints is all that needs to be thought about when thinking about climate change.

          The shifting of blame to the individual or even putting it on the individual to “help” is avoiding the real issue. And even if individuals are contributing, which I acknowledge they are but at a much lower rate of impact, then probably the best way to change individual consumption/waste is once again by abolishing capitalism which guides the production of the material reality utilized to create such individual waste in the first place.

  • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is this not a bigger story? What the fuck?? This is cataclysmic. It should be all we’re fucking hearing about. Fuck.

  • nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “sooner than expected”, “tipping point”, “nonbinding resolution”, “climate scientists warn”

    Everything is fine…

  • TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is going to be painful for us as a species. I don’t think it will render us extinct, but the weather will get significantly worse and we will probably see widespread coastal flooding in this century, which will lead to hundreds of millions of refugees. We still have plenty of time to prepare and to change course, but I fear that we will wait until a global crisis is on our doorstep before we make serious changes.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it will render us extinct.

      Oh, it probably will, though the memory of us may live on after that.

      In fact, arguably it happened long ago, and we’re currently in an echo of the past in a very immersive history lesson simultaneously teaching the grandeur and folly of humanity.

    • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it still called summer after you have 200 days of over 35 degrees? And in “winter” the max temperature drops to 25?

      Would you move co in ntries I’d this occured?

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was planning on dying one day anyway. Whether it’s from cancer or needing to eat my own neighbor for survival, it’s all the same at this point.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deep down, it’s wild to know that humanity’s peak was ultimately undone by less than 1% of the population convincing everyone else that greed is good.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      …and decreasing the utilisation of their coal fleet to the point where their coal consumption for electricity is flat and set to start decreasing next year.

      https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2023/#chapter-6-country-and-region-deep-dives-china

      And their renewable energy share is higher than the US (and most of the world) and increasing faster.

      Stop whatabouting and fix your own shit.

        • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless you’re Chinese, there’s very little you can do to stop that, as opposed to encouraging your country’s politicians who have proven commitment to curb climate change.

          So “China builds 5 coal plants every day before breakfast” is the whataboutism here.

        • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point is that this poster is a WuMao and will say anything to try and support the Chinese government. Sad that they have wormed their way in here already.

          • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not WuMao. I simply don’t appreciate useless finger pointing and implied righteousness to justify doing nothing just because some other country isn’t doing what they can either.

            We’re all watching the world burn and this finger pointing is doing little else but assure a very painful future.

            • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              But this user isn’t diverting attention from an American policy or whatever. The original post was on how we have the hottest days so far and they rightly pointed out that a government was building lots of coal plants in that context. Others have chimed in and said that the government also is investigating in renewable, though I question if that makes building coal plants okay.

              None of this is whataboutism. No one is above criticism or scrutiny.

              • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What I see is directing attention at China as a polluter and placing effectively sole blame on them.

                I feel like my point stands and it’s a perfect example of strongly implied whataboutism.

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What I see is directing attention at China as a polluter and placing effectively sole blame on them.

                  Sounds like a “you” problem then. No nation should be expanding coal burning.

  • ori@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe I’ve consumed too much sci-fi over the years. I’ve always thought the primary goal should be that of making this species a space fairing one. Secondary, they to extend the life of this planet as much as possible. It will die one day, that’s unavoidable.

    At the present, it looks like neither are being achieved. It’s all just going to collapse on itself. Maybe the human population 2.0 can resurface and try again after the planet kills almost everyone.

    I feel sorry for the younger generation and my peers with children.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always thought the primary goal should be that of making this species a space fairing one.

      What? Why??

      • Wrench Wizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not who you replied to but I agree with their sentiment and will tell you why.

        1: At the rate at which we’re destroying it, our planet won’t sustain us forever so unless we’re going to change our ways which most, especially big corps that do the most damage for profit, won’t we need to focus on an exit strategy for the inevitable.

        2: The sun will also die eventually of course. Won’t be for a long time (hopefully) but that alone means earth isn’t a forever solution for us and if we live long enough, eventually we will have to leave.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      according to data from the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer, a tool that uses satellite data and computer simulations to measure the world’s condition.

      You can read up on that study and on the climate reanalyzer.

      People who don’t even click on the article or do any research before dismissing something cannot be taken seriously.

      • Kaleunt17@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just reading such a headline and about some calculated average global temperature record is enough for me to categorize it as fearmongering. Same as with covid infection statistics in the last three years. Now with climate. Screw that. On this issue I am perfectly happy with my heuristics.