• Flic@mstdn.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        @a1studmuffin @ceenote the only reason these massive Web 2.0 platforms achieved such dominance is because they got huge before governments understood what was happening and then claimed they were too big to follow basic publishing law or properly vet content/posters. So those laws were changed to give them their own special carve-outs. We’re not mentally equipped for social networks this huge.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Could do something like discord. Rather than communities, you have “micro instances” existing on top of the larger instance, and communities existing within the micro instances. And of course make it so that making micro instances are easier to create.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If we’re talking about breaking tech oligarchs hold on social media, no closed server anywhere comes close as a replacement to meta or Twitter.