The fantasy-story of right-wing anarchy is creating misinformation, someone thinks that something like “anarcho-capitalism” is real philosophy, instead of the linguistic distortion of fascist-capitalism that it is.

Should people even specify that they are left-wing anarchists now? Do we really want to put a stop to this propagandistic joke? Anarchy will always be the extreme left into the political pendulum.

And I will tell you more: anarchism is by its nature also pacifism, as it aims to prevent any form of uncontrolled power on others. This is to silence even centrists: another fake group, people who think that it’s not “extremist” in its own abstinence, in delegating violence.

  • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Non violent evolution through class consciousness. Parallel counter economic systems that erode the states power. Strong co-operative networks like Proudhon envisioned.

    Peace can only come from peace, not violence.

    Basically what the tech fascists are trying to do without the centralisation, oligarchy and white supremacy.

    https://www.vcinfodocs.com/what-is-the-network-state

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      States employ a very wide range of tools to neutralize movements they perceive as a threat.

      How do you stop the state from using its power to stop these parallel systems from taking away its power?

      • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        True decentralisation is unstoppable. No centralised point of attack.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You don’t need centralization to present points of attack. Any exchange of goods or person involved is a potential attack surface.

          Look at any Food Not Bombs deals with. Or if you want to go further back, look at how the Black Panthers were neutralized.

          • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            When frameworks and tooling is sufficiently robust, one node being attacked doesn’t impact the whole network.

            Black Panthers weren’t decentralised, not in any comparable way anyway. Food Not Bombs has attack vectors but they would be one node, not the whole network.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              I am not understanding how any org can do anything without presenting something the state can use violence against, can you give an example?

              • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Well most things will have an attack vector if you reality think about it but the trick is to have a plethora of distributed and dynamic solutions that gradually chip away at the need for a state without anyone even thinking to attack until it’s too late.

                One could be a seamless intuitive app that enables a local currency, facilitating the velocity of trade, goods, and services outwith the existing monetary system, allowing us to create sustainable local economies.