Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it “Deepsneak”, failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can’t speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The desperate PR campaign against deepseek is also very entertaining.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      We’re playing with it at work and I honestly don’t understand the hype. It’s super verbose and would take longer for me to read the output than do the research myself. And it’s still often wrong.

      It’s cool I guess, and I’m still looking for a good use case, but it’s still a ways from taking over the world.

      • Rogue@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The same is also true of ChatGPT. On the surface the results are incredibly believable but when you dig into it or try to use some of the generated code it’s nonsense.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I certainly think it’s cool, but the further you stray from the beaten path, the more newly janky it gets. I’m sure there’s a good workflow here, it’ll just take some time to find it.