• einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      Their camera gets confused by large objects in the dark that obstruct it’s view. It has crashed into a few overturned vehicles at night because it didn’t know what they were and just disengaged instead of detecting an impasse and stopping.

      • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Are you a wizard, or what!?! When I was a child, driving each morning East to the labor camp, and West home for my bowl of thin gruel, I promised myself I would only accept a job that was East of my home.

    • Yprum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, it makes it better and more reliable in harsh conditions, I agree, but driving has always been based on people looking where they go, so camera imagery is enough for driving. If it is not safe for a person, then it’s not safe for a car with only cameras. Plus only having cameras doesn’t mean you cannot use special equipment, IR cameras can improve visibility on harsh conditions too. Not that I mean they are used, but you know, it’s a matter of what we mean with “enough to drive”. Again, I want to emphasize that I agree, having LiDAR or other tech would be much much better.