With the number of people concerned about privacy, it is a wonder why chrome is even popular.

      • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m conviced those people aren’t real and everyone is in fact secretly using an ad blocker.

        I mean, how do you not get annoyed with so much ads? People are probabaly lying in surveys to trick youtube to not blocking adblockers.

        • littlecolt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are mostly right. Think about how many people use chrome on corporate office computers that they do not have permission to install anything on or modify. It’s part of the reason Windows is so dominant. Businesses run windows and chrome a shit ton. I work for a Fortune 100 company. It’s Windows and Chrome across the whole company.

          • Pyro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I work for a large company and its the same. They even force-install Chrome despite Edge already being there! Yes, some people will make the privacy argument that Microsoft takes your data, but so will Google, and it’s not as if the business cared either way, because if they did they’d install an adblocker or Firefox, which they don’t.

        • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hate to say it, but I think you’re giving the average person way too much credit. Most people are just not that smart.

          “Think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

          Average and below internet users are not the kind of people you meet on Lemmy. They are people like the aging Gen-Xer who doesn’t know the difference between “the internet” and a web browser, or the kid whose parents shoved a tablet in their face to get them to be quiet for an hour.

          Most people want computers to be an appliance like a washing machine - the thought that they can shape their own experience on their phone or computer never even occurs to them.

      • notannpc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I forget that these people exist sometimes. I can’t ever go back to the internet with no ad blockers.

        • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realize the Internet costs money. Those sites don’t charge due to advertising. If everyone used ad blocker. There wouldn’t be internet.

          But blind there

          • Melco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Internet existed well before it was handed over to commercial entities for enshitification.

            The current Internet which basically consists of 5 giant websites who’s content is largely stuffed full of ads for the other four might not exist and I am okay with that.

            • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              And it exploded because of that. Stuff costs money. You either pay for it or ads though.

              I’d prefer having the internet of now than what was before.

              You can use ad blocker but I’m pointing out the your theory. Without ads the Internet doesn’t exist in its current form. As long as 90% don’t use ad blocker it’s all good.

      • GreyDawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suspect they spend most of their time in apps and not surfing the internet. Just a guess really since I saw the mobile traffic exceeded desktop. A lot of people don’t spend hours on the “internet” surfing. Tic Tok sure. Hell I’m getting more and more like that. Even when I use chrome I still only go the the same sites for the most part. lol

      • amenotef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It could be a good thing. Maybe they won’t bother about people blocking ads because they become even less than before.

        So maybe you need to pause the ad block a lot less.

      • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, you met my parents.

        I had to install ublock origin on my mother’s Chrome because she never would otherwise. Doesn’t even know how.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google’s doing a pretty shitty job on that front since uBlock is already prepared with a new version that will work largely the same after the changeover.

        • FoxBJK@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s just one post, but before last month Gorhill would regularly post to Reddit about it. The MV3 extension is already live in the extension store as well.

    • iamthatis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, it seems like people have basically created internal adblockers where they seem to not notice ads.

      • Melco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That works foe now until we get to Resume viewing eeeeeee Resume viewing EEEEEeeeee Resume viewing EEEEEEEE

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t. The vast majority aren’t using any kind of ad-blockers in the first place or Google would go out of business.

    • persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m going to use Chrome as long as I can. If they update and break my Adblock extensions (and there isn’t a fix in a day or two from devs), I switch browsers or find some other workaround.

      I’m glad people with more ability to avoid the problem are trying to do so proactively (via ad-on updates, alternative browsers, etc)… so I don’t need to worry about an ‘escape route’… because I know there will be one.

    • minorninth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The plan to deprecate Chrome V2 extensions has been constantly postponed again and again for years now. There is NO SCHEDULED DATE for this to happen currently, and when it is announced it will be more than 6 months out.

      Source: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-extensions/c/zQ77HkGmK9E/m/HjaaCIG-BQAJ?pli=1

      If Google really wanted to kill ad blockers, they would have done this years ago.

      They don’t. They want to force ad blockers and other similar extensions to use more efficient APIs that don’t slow down the web. Extension developers overall (not just ad blockers) aren’t happy with the changes, so they’re still working on the APIs.

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        IIRC the original cutoff date was supposed to be this summer (or possibly winter).

        Not surprised you’re being downvoted but definitely disappointed seeing it.