Summary

Speculatively, Trump might use the Insurrection Act to impose martial law, citing false claims to justify military deployment.

Pentagon purges have removed officials who previously blocked his orders, raising fears of unchecked power.

Mass detention centers, like Leavenworth, could be repurposed for immigrants and dissenters, echoing Project 2025 plans.

Concerns grow over Elon Musk’s access to government AI, potentially aiding surveillance.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Trump just moved an entire Stryker brigade, vehicles and all, to the Mexican border.

    I think the clearest way to declare himself President for Life, or at least grab a third term, is to invade Iraq Mexico for WMDs fentanyl, provoke a war, and bend everything in his favor in a system he’s already fixed.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Did you happen to notice that GWB is not currently president or dictator? Like, yeah he was shitty, but he didn’t participate in a violent attack on the nation’s capitol. He didn’t illegally try to get other states to “find him votes”. He didn’t participate in a fake elector scheme. He didn’t say the 1st Amendment wasn’t legal anymore. He didn’t consider imposing martial law…

        • thallamabond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Like, yeah he was shitty, but he didn’t participate in a violent attack on the nation’s capitol.

          Not in DC, but in Miami many of his staffers were involved in a violent riot. The threat of violence was enough for them to suspend the counting of votes, and after a deadline passed, Bush won with a supreme court decision.

          Bonus points for similarity, Roger Stone organized a violent protest (riot) with the explicit goal of stopping the counting of votes, for the benefit of republicans.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Brothers_riot

        • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You clearly didn’t pay a single fraction of a thing that guy has done, obviously. He was more subtle with his crookedness.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yes, W and his cronies were more subtle and worked more within the system. That’s the criticism.

            At the end of the day, even though W was a bad President, he still participated in the transition of power that this country has done previously. Trump tried to attempt a coup.

        • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Moron, we weren’t supposed to have warred with Iraq in the beginning. Or did you forget how 9/11 happened?

            • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              That was the lie they tried.

              That Iraq was storing weapons of mass destruction and coordinating with Al-Queda. It didn’t make a lot of sense to anyone, but dissenting opinions were immediately called treasonous so people went with it. Or maybe not went with it- more like they didn’t know what the crap to do and shrugged.

              Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. It was just something Bush wanted to finish fucking up something his dad started and a bunch of rich people made a lot of money because of Cheney’s influence on it.

    • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      The foolish orangutan wants to have Iraq on our doorstep.

      As Critical Magazine states

      “Invading Mexico to wipe out the cartels would effectively jettison everything America learned from our mistakes in the War on Terror. It would be costly, both in lives and treasure. It would be deeply unpopular — and it would fail.”

      “For starters, the cartels are not mere gangs. The cartels effectively control chunks of Mexico and are in many ways ingrained into society there. They are not a separate external growth which can be lasered off with a well-aimed cruise missile: the infection has spread throughout the body. Wiping out the cartels would require our soldiers going door to door, house to house, waging war. This is not to even mention the massive cost of such an attack. A Harvard study found that the total cost of the Iraq War was about $3 trillion; we have no reason to think Mexico would be cheaper.”

      As some guy on the internet stated:

      “There are mountains in Mexico as tough as Afghanistan. Mexicans taking to the hills, like the Afghans, would give the US a constant headache until the Americans are thrown out. Remember, like the US, Mexico started as an insurgency. Every. Single. Mexican conflict has been asymmetrical guerilla warfare (heck, that’s what the drug war is in the first place, that’s why it’s so hard - now we’ve just multiplied the problem by sending the entire Mexican Army packing to the forests and mountains). That’s what Mexico knows best. And that’s a nightmare scenario for the US.”

      The Mexican military has RPG-29s and the RPG-29 was considered so dangerous that the US refused to give M1 tanks to Iraqi security forces until years later and when they did, Iraqi M1s started to drop like flies.