And since you won’t be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is… interesting to say the least.

  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel obligated to raise awareness about these topics. I won’t prevent anyone from choosing Chrome, but at the very least it’s important for people to know what their choice can entail, and base their decision on that.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We also need to raise awareness about what giving google hegemony over defining what the web will be means.

    • Engywuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won’t prevent anyone from using FF, either. I just think that the “obligatory use Firefox” is quite arrogant, to say the least. And, to be honest, I’m quite happy it’s not going to happen until FF is managed by Mozilla and their poor choices.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The obligatory use Firefox has been a running gag in the FOSS community for ages now. Nothing arrogant about it, though it does come across as a bit blunt and brazen, to be fair.

        It’s just that letting a single entity be the ultimate authority on how the internet (or anything, for that matter) should look like is objectively a bad idea.

        Especially when that entity is widely known for being insidiously self serving, malicious and manipulative.

        That being said, enough people have explained this already, so I’m gonna leave it there.

        Have a nice day