da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 个月前Thinkpad for the winfeddit.orgexternal-linkmessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1external-linkThinkpad for the winfeddit.orgda_cow (she/her)@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square156fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 个月前No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 个月前The L series is the economical line. Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 个月前nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 个月前Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.
No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
The L series is the economical line.
Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.