• MLX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    3 months ago

    Crashing the economy is literally the point, then his rich asshole friends can acquire a ton of stocks and property while its value is low and when the adults fix it 4 years from now all his friends that got him elected will still win.

  • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not only economists, but everyone with awareness who uses logical thinking.

    Such headlines irritate me because it still offers a modicum of validity to crazy, upon casual reading.

    Environmentalist disapprove of spraying cyanide on crops” would be a more obvious example.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Except that the ultra rich ARE fine with a serious recession, they WANT one so they can buy up shit for cheap and consolidate power.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shock_Doctrine

      The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is a 2007 book by Canadian author and social activist Naomi Klein. In the book, Klein argues that neoliberal economic policies promoted by Milton Friedman and the Chicago school of economics have risen to global prominence because of a deliberate strategy she calls “disaster capitalism”. In this strategy, political actors exploit the chaos of natural disasters, wars, and other crises to push through unpopular policies such as deregulation and privatization. This economic “shock therapy” favors corporate interests while disadvantaging and disenfranchising citizens when they are too distracted and overwhelmed to respond or resist effectively.

      This is VERY rational from the perspective of the ultrawealthy (it is really the only strategy they actually want to use if possible) it is just murderous and cruel.

      The US economy is about to crash, this is the goal.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        And they will get away with it if the majority of people still find themselves unable to act years from now.

        In this county, politics as normal has failed and cannot be redeemed at all. Something new has to happen; what I don’t know, a missing ingredient.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Somehow, I hope, even pray, that we will avoid a violent revolution. Which has got to sound just asinine, I know; but I figure Mango Mussolini is specifically trying to cause an uprising to give iron clad “justification” for implementing martial law (and cancelling elections, of course, for “security”).

          I dunno, I guess I’ve got this utterly foolish notion that if the mask off fascist society fails to “gel together”, we could, I dunno, have a relatively peaceful dissolution of the federal government, leaving each state it’s own nation. I do not want this, it’s a fucked up resolution that will still cause massive poverty and unrest.

          Better than being led into WW3 by a retarded Cheeto, however…😝

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            And right into their playbooks. The right has said the next civil war well be bloodless if the left allows it. And it seems you are.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I voted for Trump because he said he would AVOID a Recession! And I’m TOTALLY ON BOARD with a Recession NOW because I think for Myself!

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 months ago

    The rich pick up assets during g every crash, widening inequality. We need a wealth tax to start reversing some of those gains

      • Hello_there@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wealth tax over $10M or even 100M would still do massive good. If we can hit billionaires and reinvest that in the working class, the economy is going to go crazy

        • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My dream policy would be a wealth tax that includes company ownership that could be paid with company shares. Any shares paid this way would go to an escrow that is controlled by the employees of the company, eventually trending companies towards becoming worker coops.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The 99% don’t have any unrealized gains to begin with. Even people near the top end of that scale who do have investments have all or most of them in retirement accounts where the gains eventually get taxed as income (traditional) or not at all (Roth) instead.

        • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Unrealized gains means that the investment vehicle has increased in value since it was purchased, but hasn’t been sold at that value. Every type of investment is going to have either unrealized gains or losses until it’s sold.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nearly every homeowner has unrealized gains in their house value.

          Edit: Also, all these unrealized gains of the very rich would also be taxed when transacted, like the retirement funds, but there are loopholes. They can leverage that wealth without “realizing” the value.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, absolutely. Coming out of the great depression we clawed back so much, but that’s been slowly dismantled and we’re back in the roaring 20s now

        Things are more complicated now, but there’s certainly ways to do this if we have politicians who will fight to carry out our will

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean… Fuck economic theory, the entire field is a mess of myths and narratives. There’s good work to be sure, but governments and organizations just find models that support what they want to do, no matter how much it conflicts with observations

            There’s historical examples in this country, there’s modern examples like the Scandinavian model… Wealth was redistributed, there’s

            I have no idea what you’re asking for. What even is a wealth tax “working” to you?

            I mean I could pull up some economists who go over numbers and adamantly advocate for wealth redistribution, but I feel like nothing I give you is going to actually change your mind

              • Auli@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Tax companies revenue first. It would be at a lower rate then profit but also doesn’t allow them to hide the profit.

              • theneverfox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I never said anything about income tax… But again, these are real things that we used to have and they have elsewhere:

                Tax brackets to to 90%+ on business profits - incentivize companies to reinvest in r&d while disincentiving investment

                Tax inheritance and crack down on forever trusts

                Progressively tax money moving in and out of the country, and close up tax loopholes (killing the tax filing industry would be a necessary prerequisite)

                You could even revamp capital gains and certain types of loan to somehow figure into a progressive income tax

                And most importantly - this has been done before. It has been done, you can pick apart suggested methods and come up with excuses for why it’s impossible… But it’s so clearly not. Everything else is an engineering problem

                If you want to hear economists talk about it, Garys economics on YouTube popped into my feed a few days ago. He’s far from the only one, even Warren Buffett has gone through a plan where he says the full tax burden could be put on businesses

                And if you want to know why I don’t respect economics… It’s not because I’m not read up on it, it’s because: how can you read up on it and still think taxing the wealthy is impossible? This has been written about by economists for decades, but it doesn’t matter because there’s more convenient economic theories to push far and wide

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s also the option of additional tax brackets for those wealthy whose income still counts as income. Why do the tax brackets stop? Massachusetts has one set $1M that’s doing pretty well

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because most of the 1% wealth isnt in the form of wages (hence why people say working class vs wealthy sometimes).

          Sure you could increase the income brackets, but I think (would need to double check) that wealth tax would make a larger impact.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Sure, but we know income taxes work, we have a mechanism for collecting them, and we already have a ladder of brackets that are completely logical to extend.

            While I’m also for some sort of wealth tax, I think that will be much harder to even define, much less implement. There are a lot of loopholes that need to be plugged, an entire industry for the purpose of finding those loopholes, and no objective way to even quantize unrealized gains

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I’m going to make the economy better by day one!”

    “It’s hard to predict how the economy will go”

    “It’s just an adaptation period it will get better”

    “It’s not going to be that bad”

    “It’s bad but it’s all Biden’s fault”

    “It’s going to be worse but it will be worth it” <— you are here

    “It keeps getting worse but it’s because everyone is preventing me from going all the way with what I’m doing”

    “It will all be fixed once I invade Greenland”

    “I need a third mandate to fix this country that Biden has broken”

    “It will all be fixed once we invade Canada”

    “I had no choice but to call air strikes against these American citizens. They were not peaceful protesters, they were violent secessionist terrorists”

    “I declare all journalists terrorists and ordered for them to be shot on sight”

    “We are about to achieve a great victory against the secessionist forces that are surrounding the capital”

    “Please don’t let them shoot me”

    • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Better yet, he’s making everyone from every other country hate America as well. And since 70% of Americans either voted for him or couldn’t be bothered to vote (same as voting for him), American people are being blamed for being supportive of him.

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trump would say shit tastes amazing, and his base would start eating shit every day until they get sick. They would never say he was wrong when he so clearly is.