• self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    you and your friend really should have spent any time at all looking into who runs worldcoin and how fucking monstrously dystopian it is before rushing into buttcoin of all places to defend the “valid use of the technology behind crypto” (???) you both imagined existed in the OP’s screenshot

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Cryptography isn’t cryptocurrency. It’s completely different

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        yeh I know, so calling out zk proofs as “the technology behind crypto” really reads like calling hydrogen gas “the technology behind the Hindenburg”, doesn’t it.

        • bitofhope@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t think that simile quite lands. Hindenburg worked as expected until its sudden catastrophic demise and hydrogen caused both the function and the failure. Zero knowledge proofs neither make cryptocoins work nor are they the reason why they don’t work.

          A more apt comparison is something like saying levers are the technology behind this perpetual motion machine.

          The design incorporates levers that fail to make the device function, but it’s not like levers are useless because of that.

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I mean, have you tried building the gizmo in the picture? Just because similar designs have always been used by scammers and crackpots doesn’t mean the tech is bad. Now, if you could invest into my startup…