Mex@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 年前A quarter of Brits want a ban on fake grasswww.thisismoney.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down111
arrow-up1144arrow-down1external-linkA quarter of Brits want a ban on fake grasswww.thisismoney.co.ukMex@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 年前message-square86fedilink
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 年前It can be useful. It’s a great surface for doing any form of outdoor exercise on.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 年前Pretty absurd to pretend any of its uses come close to outweighing the negatives.
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 年前Claiming it’s “not actually useful” though is just wrong.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 年前If a thing does more harm than good, it isn’t useful, the people using it are just selfish.
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前That’s an interesting new definition of ‘useful’ you have.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 年前It’s certainly more sound than yours, which apparently requires nothing more than “it feels kinds of nice to step on” while it poisons the ground and eliminates yet more of your local ecosystem.
It can be useful. It’s a great surface for doing any form of outdoor exercise on.
Pretty absurd to pretend any of its uses come close to outweighing the negatives.
Claiming it’s “not actually useful” though is just wrong.
If a thing does more harm than good, it isn’t useful, the people using it are just selfish.
That’s an interesting new definition of ‘useful’ you have.
It’s certainly more sound than yours, which apparently requires nothing more than “it feels kinds of nice to step on” while it poisons the ground and eliminates yet more of your local ecosystem.