• StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Musk insisted on the earnings call that protest against him are “very organized” and “paid for,” repeating suggestions he’s made previously about shadowy financiers who are supposedly funding demonstrations. Musk also said the “real reason” there are protests against him is that people who are receiving fraudulent money from government agencies that are now getting cut. Musk has never provided any evidence for this assertion.

    What a delusional dipshit. He has lost touch with reality. His ego is so fragile he has to make up fairy tales. Poor wittuh snowfwake

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny that a guy who buys elections would suddenly be upset at the thought of other people being paid to make political statements.

      He’s wrong as shit, of course. People genuinely hate that useless sack of shit.

      But it is funny.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Last I checked he was the richest person on the planet. Couldn’t he just pay the protestors more than what they are paid now to make them stop protesting?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Until recently, it was a huge crime to make an unprovable statement in any way, shape, or form in an earnings call. Even rich people were scared to break that rule. I miss when we had laws.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s seal the coffin for Tesla. If it is profitable again, it will fuel fascism again. This brand need to go bankrupt.

  • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m pretty sure Peter Theil fucked him over AGAIN. Thiel himself has been successfully lurking in the shadows to do evil shit and get what he wants, while Musk (although certainly far from innocent) has become the perfect scapegoat.

    For months Musk was this untouchable god that couldn’t be removed from Trump’s office. They got Elon to handle all the dirty work, attach his face and name to some truly despicable shit, made him the most hated man in the country, then gradually made him look like an annoying nuisance who was disrespected by all the “adults in the white house,” and got everyone to start questioning if his mental health was spiraling, and now that Theil’s protege is handling technology and AI policy they no longer need Elon to leave his fingerprints on everything do anything.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m sure that there was maneuvering for influence, but he’s a grown, competent adult. Most of his wealth is associated with a company that has made its products an identity symbol for progressives. It should not be that hard to see that becoming a colossally-important financial supporter of, very-visibly palling around with, and performing some of the more-unpopular actions for the extraordinarily-unpopular-with-progressives Trump was going to piss people off. Having Trump do a sales pitch for said products on the White House lawn is just icing on the cake.

      He was not trapped in that situation. Hell, even if he wanted to make huge donations, lots of wealthy people donate money to presidential campaigns — albeit not normally at the level that Musk did — and they don’t normally engage in the kind of incredibly-visible association that Musk did. He could have walked away. He could have even just asked Trump to appoint someone who he agreed with in the role, rather than taking it himself.

      And this isn’t Musk’s first high-profile brand management screw-up. With Twitter, he was roundly criticized for the rebrand to X, given that Twitter had a very-well-established, valuable brand. Like, after the first time around, you’d think that he could reasonably have someone sanity-checking some of this for impact on brand.

      I don’t expect Musk to be mistake-free, but I really think that if you placed most business leaders in his shoes, they’d have had an inkling that this was quite likely to be trouble.

      • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am not trying to defend Musk, just pointing out that even if he steps back from the White House it definitely doesn’t mean we’ve seen the exit of the final boss.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah “blood boy” Thiel and Palantir and the like are the “deep state” the right witch hunted for so long. Pretty sure https://westworld.fandom.com/wiki/Engerraund_Serac is partially based on him with the “I’ll control the future of the human race and swim through the blood to get to the ending I think is best because I’m rich”

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      thiels obsession with using palintir as a spying tool is a thing for him for like 10 years already, funny it was around the same time he brought down gawker, through the hot-dog skin maniac, hogan. i read somewhere the only reason he targeted gawker, was them reporting on his business pratices, and not because of the gay thing.

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    He does the Nazi salute on the big stage and it shocked when he gets a collective middle finger salute back.

    On the other hand, he went with Trump. Everybody going that way gets burned, used up, and thrown away. That things wouldn’t work out was expected. It’s also suspected that Musk would be used as the wrecking ball to crush institutions and when the inevitable problems arise, Musk would be blamed and tossed aside to keep the rest of the regime in the clear.

    • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      He does the Nazi salute on the big stage and it shocked when he gets a collective middle finger salute back.

      To be fair - people haven’t given a shit in years about the nasty stuff companies and their owners do. He probably just expected it to continue that way.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most CEOs do try to stay out of the spotlight. Those that are more in the spotlight at least try to do some positive PR and not rock the boat too much. Security through obscurity if you will.

        Of course Musk and Zuckerberg are some of the few that dance with the devil in the spotlight and have made their company/ies their whole personality. They paint their faces larger than life on the company and then act surprised when people take it personally.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I celebrate the news.

    The company produced 362,000 vehicles and delivered over 336,000.

    That’s a surprisingly high number. Too many fascists these days.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    “The Teslas that will be fully autonomous in June in Austin will be Model Ys, so that is currently on track to be able to do paid rides, fully autonomously in June, and then to be in many other cities in the U.S. by the end of this year,” Musk said on the call.

    Okay, so there is zero chance that there will be fully autonomous model Ys doing paid rides anywhere for the next 5-10 years (at least).

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nazi controlled death traps. It’s about power and control:

        Punish the poor: “take the bus peasant”

        Extort the wealthy: “to bypass traffic, please insert $40. FOR $80 we’ll speed for you to shave 10 mins off your trip.”

        Murder the rebellious either inside or outside the cab: "tonights news we look at the car accident where AOC was driven off a cliff and her protesters were run over repeatedly by an autonomous tesla.

        Gate the elite: sorry, this area is restricted to C class passenger licenses or higher.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You think it’s going to be hard for Tesla to convince a city in Texas to let them do autonomous rides?

      Texas.

      I’m not suggesting they’ll do a lot of rides, but there will be at least a handful until something goes wrong sooner than it should and they force a pause.

      Edit: and to be clear, something very wrong. Waymo does wrong things all the time and it’s allowed. It’s going to have to do enough wrong things in a short time or a very very bad thing sooner than it should. But they’ll do rides until that.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, I think Tesla is scared to try. They know that their cars won’t work. They know that it will be a living and dying disaster, and everyone will be posting videos on TikTok. The reason they haven’t seriously tried to create such a city is because they’re trying to ride the AI hype, not because they actually think it’s a good idea to implement.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Tesla might be, Elon isn’t. They’ll do what he says. They’re spending billions getting the cybercab ready. They’ll try it.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anti autonomous vehicle sentiment is strange to me. As long as they’re doing better than the average person, I think it’s not a terrible thing.

        For reference, I saw 6 different accidents on my drive to work today. It’s a really low bar to clear.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          As far as I can tell it’s an issue of completely destroyed trust in rich techies, who are the only people who can afford to make autonomous vehicles at the moment.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You think it’s going to be hard for Tesla to convince a city in Texas to let them do autonomous rides?

        All I know is that Elon couldn’t predict the sunrise. He lies and makes overconfident statements constantly.