Aside of these signs and the address numbers, the building is completely unmarked.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So in that building there’s a nonflammable reactant that’s super dangerous to life and reacts with water, and a flammable chemical that is quite toxic.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As others have said, these are NFPA signs.

    What I want to know is why there are two different ones. What the hell does that mean?

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Section 4.2.3.3 of NFPA 704 guides how to handle multiple chemicals.

      You can combine the worst of each category into a composite, list each individually, or do a hybrid option.

      The posts saying there are two chemicals are true but likely incomplete… There are probably several different chemicals and they decided to go with the hybrid method.

      My guess is that they combined the worst rating of everything that doesn’t need special handling, and have a stand alone for the chemical that is incompatible with water (or even combined for several chemicals that are incompatible with water).

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        But it’s just slapped on the side of the building with no indication of which chemicals the labels are for, I don’t think that’s how it’s supposed to be done. It’d be like mixing two chemicals into a bottle and then putting two labels on it.

        I think there should just be one label that combines the warning levels of both i.e. 3-2-2-W

        • Devadander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Why are you assuming the chemicals are mixed together inside the building? Two separate chemicals, two distinct risks.

            • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 hours ago

              First responders need to know that there are two chemicals inside so that they don’t stop taking precautions when they encounter the first one.

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              They’re required to be individually labeled/categorized. And supposed to be on 2 exterior walls, and any doors, and on the containers themselves

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Sure, but I don’t think the building should have two labels. I think it should have one label that reflects a warning for everything in the building.

            Imagine you have a crate with two different chemicals. The chemicals are in different bottles so they aren’t mixed, and each bottle has its own label.

            Should the crate have two unidentified labels like this, or one? There’s no indication what those labels refer to on the building.

    • spizzat2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m no expert, so I can’t tell for sure, but my guess is that they’re storing two different chemicals. The left one looks like it’s a non-flammable, extremely hazardous material that shouldn’t be exposed to water (maybe an alkali metal, like lithium or sodium). The right one is a hazardous material that is a fire hazard above 93°C (200°F), but otherwise stable (maybe some kind of diesel?)

      So… If I had to take a wild guess, diesel and lithium batteries?