The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 个月前How convenient!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square173fedilinkarrow-up11.48Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageHow convenient!lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 个月前message-square173fedilink
minus-squareRisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 个月前Isn’t Synology having issues because they expect you to use specifically their drives?
minus-squared15d@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 个月前Yes, apparently they remove features if you don’t use synology-branded drives. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/nas/synology-requires-self-branded-drives-for-some-consumer-nas-systems-drops-full-functionality-and-support-for-third-party-hdds
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前Na. It just shows a warning, but it doesn’t have any effect. Annoying, but not enough to change my mind about them. I’ve got two units and both have been rock solid.
Isn’t Synology having issues because they expect you to use specifically their drives?
Yes, apparently they remove features if you don’t use synology-branded drives.
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/nas/synology-requires-self-branded-drives-for-some-consumer-nas-systems-drops-full-functionality-and-support-for-third-party-hdds
Na. It just shows a warning, but it doesn’t have any effect. Annoying, but not enough to change my mind about them. I’ve got two units and both have been rock solid.