tapdattl@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoShould I?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down121file-text
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageShould I?lemmy.worldtapdattl@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square107fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJerb322@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·1 year agoProbably clear the STOP sign. If you’re flying over it, you don’t have to stop,right?
minus-squarepartial_accumen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoCops hate this one trick! The STOP sign clearly is out of its jurisdiction above the sign itself.
minus-squaretapdattl@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoYeah I don’t think the stop sign applies to airborne vehicles
minus-squareTheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTechnically true. I doubt planes stop for that stop sign after all.
Probably clear the STOP sign. If you’re flying over it, you don’t have to stop,right?
Cops hate this one trick! The STOP sign clearly is out of its jurisdiction above the sign itself.
Yeah I don’t think the stop sign applies to airborne vehicles
Yeah but light pole and tree sure do
Pfftt, barely a inconvenience.
Technically true. I doubt planes stop for that stop sign after all.