Who would have known? Asking AI things was never a real job?!

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      It does a pretty poor job explaining itself, at all. Ironically, it probably would have behooved the author to have used an AI to proofread this.

      The hype did not magic the jobs into existence. Because this was all part of marketing chatbots to the enterprise. They wanted companies to believe in the magic of chatbots.

      This is a full paragraph from the article. What the fuck is this trying to say? Who is “they”? Literally no questions were answered by this article.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 天前

        maybe “they” refers to those who have most to gain from all the ai bullshit. So likely executives in chatgpt for example. If the writers named something directly it could leave them open for lawsuit if things go badly

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 天前

          If the writers named something directly it could leave them open for lawsuit if things go badly

          So far, I don’t think the author is capable of writing something coherent enough to be considered libel.

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 天前

    There are already tools and other AI to write the prompt for you. The prompt engineer is automated out of their job.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 天前

    Maybe not just prompt engineer, but that skill will be required among other to effectively utilize many AI tools since the low-code/no-code capabilities are not quite there yet.