

He’s a Republican, and there’s no “R” in “consequences”…


He’s a Republican, and there’s no “R” in “consequences”…


Another Royal Proclamation from King Steven the Turd.


Just ask Kristi Noem to take care of that watchdog


No, you are the one that is basically arguing that a Fed can just flash their badge and get out of a state DUI. It doesn’t work like that.
The Supremacy clause deals with state laws that specifically are in conflict with Federal Law (or a Federal court ruling or regulation): the Feds win those, as long as the Federal act is Constitutional to begin with.
I don’t think the Federal Government can win a case in court that says that it 1) needs to rent cars locally to do its business and 2) those cars need to not have any identifying info mandated by the state at all. Especially when legislation already exists that let’s Feds bypass local registration requirements entirely and buy their own shit.
Having license plates on vehicles is not in direct contradiction to any Federal act. The Feds are just being lazy.


These vehicles are not owned by the Federal Government, though. They are owned by a rental agency, which is subject to State Law. Those law don’t dissolve into a puddle just because a Fed is renting them.
If ICE wants to flout State licensing laws, they can just buy all the cars they use. Lord knows they have enough money to do that.



Intentional Groaning penalty on the Offense, 10 yard penalty and Loss of Composure.


“Ask your Mom”


Move Zig, for great justice


Well, the Feds need to cite those specific laws, then. Illinois is well within their rights to enforce this stuff unless there is a specific Federal law that says otherwise.


I doubt there is any Federal law that authorizes Federal employees to fiddle with license plates for cars that are registered with a state.
If the Federal government wants to do that they have their own system to register cars, independent of any state. If they were substituting State plates with US Government plates, maybe they have a point. But they are simply ignoring local laws, because they are inconvenient. The Supremacy clause doesn’t allow that.


Isnt that the clause that makes Donald Trump the supreme ruler, like King Cyrus?


No, I think in this case they may be referencing the relevant Illinois statute. I bet it refers to “Motor Vehicle Operators”.


… And they basically admitted it.
“Our operators comply with federal law and, consistent with the Supremacy Clause, endeavor to comply with state law except where doing so could compromise or interfere with the federal mission and operations,” the DHS said.
Which basically is another way of saying “We do what we want and Illinois can fuck off”.


The fog of tequila


And that night he went and partied like it’s 1999


We’ll all have to go back to having sex with your wife


If he really is one of the best, he should have no problem winning a primary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot