Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.al to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 9 months agoImpossiblesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down113
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageImpossiblesopuli.xyzLady Butterfly @lazysoci.al to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareblitzen@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months ago Dionysius did not use a year zero; the year preceding AD 1 was 1 BC. “The Oxford Companion to the Year” by Blackburn & Holford-Strevens There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
minus-squareMalfeasant@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoBC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…
Removed by mod
There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
BC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…