Michael@lemmy.perthchat.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agoJapan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Trainingtechnomancers.aiexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1381arrow-down1102cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1279arrow-down1external-linkJapan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Trainingtechnomancers.aiMichael@lemmy.perthchat.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agomessage-square92fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareGutless2615@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoYour argument that it is useful as a copyright infringing machine is that it can reproduce a public domain work? That’s… not the argument you think it is.
minus-squarezkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoMy message was pretty clear about which part of their claim I was skeptical about and what I was testing for. It’s not what you described here.
Your argument that it is useful as a copyright infringing machine is that it can reproduce a public domain work? That’s… not the argument you think it is.
My message was pretty clear about which part of their claim I was skeptical about and what I was testing for. It’s not what you described here.