• Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fortunately, the very clever scientists at NASA have long since determined that there is essentially no risk from Starlink and similar satellite constellations,

    That is patently not true to the point that it is effectively a lie

    https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/nasa-starlink-warning

    This entire discussion you have been intellectually dishonest and using propaganda talking points. You are no longer welcome on my internet.

    • orange_squeezer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right. I’ll note, that your linked article says nothing about Kessler beyond a quote of his saying that space debris would continue to increase even if all launches stopped. Otherwise, the article mainly comments that the sheer number of Starlink satellites below the ISS could interfere with launch/entry opportunities while drastically increasing the number of space objects being tracked by the DoD and NASA.

      There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Starlink, all I’m pointing out is that Kessler Syndrome is not one of them. I’m assuming you’ve somewhat ironically blocked me, but since we’re exchanging links, here is an article that interviews several scientists including one that worked under Kessler at NASA and now works on NASA’s orbital debris modeling.

      https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/features/understanding-the-misunderstood-kessler-syndrome/