• Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not only always voting within the two same parties, but actively voting for the worse of the two. Which is typically how things go here in Canada too.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      only two parties? But the liberal party in Canada was elected after making promises to pass electoral reform! Surely they wouldn’t break their promise so you have to vote for them right?

      • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, sadly the alternative Conservatives are still the worse option despite the lack of kept promises from the Liberals. And depending on your specific running unfortunately sometimes the only option you have is to vote Liberal to attempt to unseat that ridings conservative. Or just not vote at all, which also just results in a conservative win. At least it’s a different guy at the helm this time I guess. We’ll see if that makes a difference.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They wanted to implement a system where they would always have been people’s first or second choice so they would have ended up winning every time