$5 billion Google lawsuit over “Incognito mode” tracking moves a step closer to trial
www.theverge.com
Did you know that private browsing modes aren’t very private?

$5 billion Google lawsuit over ‘incognito mode’ tracking moves a step closer to trial | Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers denied Google’s push for a summary judgment in a lawsuit over the way it tracked…::Google’s push for a summary judgment in a lawsuit over tracking internet activity even after users activated Chrome’s “Incognito mode” was denied.

  • MagneticFusion@lemm.eeEnglish
    486·
    1 year ago

    Stop Using Chrome

    Literally do not understand why the fuck anyone still uses that browser. If you want Chromium, use Vivaldi, use Brave, SHIT USE EDGE. STILL BETTER THAN CHROME.

    Chrome is easily the most invasive browser, one of the worst when it comes to resource management, and one of the most locked down browsers.

    Ideally you should just use Firefox.

    • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      171·
      1 year ago

      Posing Brave as an alternative to Chrome is ridiculous. It’s a crypto scam company that intends to profit from advertising. And they have been caught inserting referrals into url suggestions.

      Don’t know why you think Edge is better either. Microsoft is no more your friend than Google and they have every intention to collect as much data as possible.

      If you want chromium, use a build of un-googled chromium. You don’t need to replace one evil with another if you can just rip it out altogether.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.comEnglish
      63·
      1 year ago

      You know Firefox has literally the exact same feature Google is being sued over, right? A lawsuit doesn’t automatically have merit just because you don’t like the party being sued.

      • PorkSoda@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Are you talking about private viewing mode? Firefox has it, but it may not be implemented the same and it may not have the same level of tracking.

        Sounds like you may know though. What’s the issue with Firefox’s implementation?

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.comEnglish
          23·
          1 year ago

          I know exactly what Chrome does and I assume Firefox does the same because I don’t know what else it would do. It basically acts as if you created a temporary profile that’s deleted when you close the window. There’s a little more to it than that, like being able to opt in to using extensions from your main profile, but basically it’s just for things like preventing your family from seeing that you’ve been watching porn or shopping for Christmas presents.

          People seem to get confused a lot because it doesn’t use encryption, hide your IP address, or anything like that, and you can still be tracked if you sign into things in the private/incognito window.