• Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Fan”

    That’s the part that precludes payment. Fan works legally have to be free, that’s what makes it not copyright infringement.

    • nintendiator@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the part we have to combat. The idea that being a fan of something means any contribution you do to the fandom has to be treated as essentially unpaid workforce for the franchise. In truth, it’s nothing in the fact that you are a fan, but rather the fact that the thing you are a fan of is defended by some of the vilest scume of the earth (lawyers) that is a problem.

      Down with copyright law!

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        People also shouldn’t just be able to make money off of other people’s creations without limits.

        IMO, ideally we would implement a system of ‘open licensing’ where people could freely use others IP as long as they pay a public, standardized percent of revenue based on the usage.

        • nintendiator@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          as long as they pay

          To who?

          To the IP licensors? Nah. Pass. Prefer piracy.

          To the creators? Arguably much better.

          How to control intermediaries in those cases?

          Also payment processor information usually requires KYC crap and puts people in lots of danger of fire from trigger-happy companies (or governments).