Argument from Ignorance (Ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a proposition is false because they personally haven’t heard of it, or it’s not commonly known to them.
“Well, I've never heard of that” ⟶ Implies: “Therefore, it's probably wrong ornot credible.”
It’s an epistemic fallacy, where the absence of knowledge is treated as evidence of absence or insignificance.
Essentially, your ignorance of the subject matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, it just means you’re ignorant of the subject matter. 🤷 🤣
You will not find that I have declared any fact beyond my ignorance, and it is rather the imputation of an assertion beyond that ignorance that constitutes the genuine fallacy here.
I’ve literally never heard any human being praise or admire royalty, aside from Diana.
Argument from Ignorance (Ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a proposition is false because they personally haven’t heard of it, or it’s not commonly known to them.
“Well, I've never heard of that” ⟶ Implies: “Therefore, it's probably wrong or not credible.”It’s an epistemic fallacy, where the absence of knowledge is treated as evidence of absence or insignificance.
Essentially, your ignorance of the subject matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, it just means you’re ignorant of the subject matter. 🤷 🤣
You will not find that I have declared any fact beyond my ignorance, and it is rather the imputation of an assertion beyond that ignorance that constitutes the genuine fallacy here.
deleted by creator
what about the knig of sweden?
Compromise: we can keep monarchy but from now on they all have to wear bunny ears.
cat ears ok?
yea sure
Only praise and admiration from very old people, for everyone else he’s basically just a goofy mascot that keeps doing weird things.
that’s the only things a head of state should be allowed to do
Sounds like exactly what a king should be.
Knigge was German
yeah but he didn’t wear as many hats
As long you don’t say the hard r