• floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Prove it if you can. Try not to suck Nazi cock on your way to that, though.

    Well, then you’re welcome to prove that. I await your evidence to support your assertion.

    I’ll warn you ahead of time: arguing against facts usually ends poorly. Beware.

    I’m gonna sleep great tonight because I didn’t defend Nazi IDF soldiers.

    • entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.

        • entwine413@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation.

          The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.