fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3か月前Cursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1838arrow-down110
arrow-up1828arrow-down1imageCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3か月前message-square97fedilink
minus-squareDevadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·3か月前Any other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
minus-squarebstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3か月前Try this page if you want to read more about it: https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·3か月前Thank you, that’s very helpful - unlike cretins downvoting me for asking a question. Upvoted.
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3か月前That’s because when you just type “source?” and nothing else people perceive it as you challenging/denying the claim in a slightly hostile manner
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-23か月前Thankfully the perceived hostility was then dispelled with a followup comment calling people cretins. …wait.
minus-squareDevadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3か月前Seriously? https://lemmy.world/post/32326900
Any other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
Source?
Bidwell, J. (1997)
In the meme.
Try this page if you want to read more about it:
https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
Thank you, that’s very helpful - unlike cretins downvoting me for asking a question.
Upvoted.
That’s because when you just type “source?” and nothing else people perceive it as you challenging/denying the claim in a slightly hostile manner
Thankfully the perceived hostility was then dispelled with a followup comment calling people cretins.
…wait.
Seriously?
https://lemmy.world/post/32326900