(I’m not rawdogging it. I do not know enough about linux to install one of the rawest forms of it.)

  • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    EndeavourOS is probaby your best bet - it’s basically Arch with training wheels that doesn’t mess with the core repos like Manjaro does, and the community is super helpful for newbies who are stil learning.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      How come you say Manjaro is not recommended? I went straight for Arch years ago so I don’t know what’s wrong with the derivatives.

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It probably is. I think there are newer examples available, but I lack the motivation to find them for others. I feel it still represents the fundamental issues with Manjaro, if not the current specific ones.

      • million@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It’s had a few security issues in the past and last I heard they introduce a lag between packages going into the arch repos and things being available in Manjaro - even for critical security updates.

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Endeavour OS. It’s solid.

    I don’t recommend Manjaro. Its delayed release but no testing methodology has caused me grief a number of times. I still run a VM with it on it, but the only VM OS that has had more issues was windows

    Edit it’s /its

  • hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Arch. No I’m not being a troll or suggesting something bad.

    The reason I suggest Arch by itself is because of ArchInstall script. From there, it’s simple to use.

    Learn to use pacman, and maybe an AUR Helper like Paru or Yay.

    Arch Wiki is quite robust.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agree. I went from Ubuntu to Arch many years ago and everything I read in the installation guide was new to me, yet I managed. “So can you!” If I did it…

  • GreenMouse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Expect a bunch of people in comments who will deliberately recommend default Arch instead of answering your question.

    I’ve been using EndeavourOS for a few years now, and haven’t had any problems with it.

  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    why do you want it to be arch based in particular? the entire point of an arch based distro is that you’re rawdogging it.

    if you want something simple, use something Ubuntu/debian based. if you want something more complex, just try arch, it’s not that hard

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Expect a bunch of people in comments who will deliberately recommend default Arch


    Arch


    Any of them that use the Arch repos directly are probably fine. Don’t use Manjaro.


    Manjaro or Endeavour.


    Just base arch


    Garuda


    Steamos


    Artix + OpenRC


    CachyOS


    EndeavourOS and nothing else.

    I suppose that pretty much covers the full gamut.

    EDIT: Here’s the Linux distro family tree:

    https://github.com/FabioLolix/LinuxTimeline/releases

    It lists 19 still-living Arch-based distros. Disregarding category-based recommendations and looking only at explicitly-named recommendations, as of this writing, you’ve explicitly been recommended 7 so far, or over a third of what exist. :-)

  • maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    None other than base Arch.

    If you don’t know enough about Linux, that’s the point, installing Arch will teach you. Manually, not with archinstall.

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Archinstall if you’re brave, endeavor if you aren’t.

    Although if you don’t want to rawdog it, I’d recommend fedora or tumbleweed instead. The whole point of arch is that it’s simple to keep everything on your head.

  • idefix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Manjaro or Endeavour. I have and appreciate immensly both of them, and a slight preference for Manjaro due its release cycle.