Andrew Jackson reflects on creating the Manhattan Project’s Trinity Test, for which he says no CG was involved.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Practical effects age better. Compare The TRex in Jurassic Park vs any of the effects George Lucas added to Star Wars. Even with 5 more years of computer advancement the TRex looks great today and the special editions look like bantha dung.

    • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The CGI that removed cars in the background will still have removed cars in the background and you wouldn’t have noticed.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Removal is additive.

          They have to add stuff to where the cars are. If they only removed the car there would be a blank spot where the car was.

          You won’t believe how much is invisibly added digitally in seemingly simple movies these days.

    • Detun3d@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jurassic Park’s T-Rex also used CGI. This video explains a little. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4UuQxjFpfU Good CGI is wonderful as are good practical effects. A great team working together from the start so results look believable is key. Bad CGI often comes from not preparing scenes ahead of time to include it.

    • strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed compare the original Star Wars 3 films compared to episodes 1, 2, 3.

      The practical effects are much more seamless