• Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    In fact we’d be absolutely delighted to filter all the oligarch class pedos out of politics. And yes, all means all. From all corners. Businessmen, politicians, faith leaders. All of them.

  • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hilarious that they think they “got us” with someone who was president a quarter century ago.

    Democrats voted unanimously to release the files, Republicans voted to hide them. Explain that, MAGA.

  • h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    4 days ago

    Guess I’ll have to take all the Clinton flags off my f850 dually, take all the Clinton signs outta of my yard, and quit wearing my made in China Clinton hat. Hell, I might have to stop letting Bill fuck my wife.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The left doesn’t worship their politicians as the second coming of Jesus Christ son of God.

      • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And even if he WAS- Bill Clinton isn’t a fucking pedophile. An adulterer, a sleazy dude? Sure. But you’re not going to convince me that Bill Clinton is into children without some solid evidence.

          • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I mean, we already have “the list”- associates who travelled on his plane. Bill’s on it. Bill Gates, too. Plenty of people I’m not convinced are kid fuckers are on that list, but that’s been public information for years.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The difference between worship and respect is that one is earned and the other is not.

        If you worship someone you follow them unconditionally no matter what they do. They can openly brag about molesting women, they can get convicted felonies in 34 counts, they can make life hell for a large part of the population, and someone who worships that person will just lap it all up and follow right along.

        Contrary to that, respect can be lost quite quickly, as seen with a lot of people who were very popular with left-wingers. 10 years ago most leftwingers loved Musk. How many left-wingers do you see that still worship Musk and follow his every mood?

        Same holds true with every other person on the left who failed. They are gone in an instant.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          The former communist bloc took a lot longer than an instant. Their leaders were worshiped by some of the population.

          North Korea is far left and their leader and his family are almost deities.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Uff… again someone who thinks that politics are binary and left is left and right is right. Sure, a leader cult dictator is exactly the same as a liberal social democracy. All the same, correct?

            The North Korean political system is close to identical to Nazi Germany. Another “far left” country then, correct?

            We all know that liberty, freedom of personal expression and equality are the main ideals of North Korea, correct?

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is the exact opposite of what I am saying.

              The left/right spectrum is being conflated with the authoritarian/libertarian spectrum.

              I’ve given many examples to counter the claim that “the left” won’t worship a leader.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I expected that anyone who is actually following the discussion would understand that when we are talking about left and right we are talking about left and right in the year 2025 and not in the year 1958, and that we are talking about left and right in the west and not left and right in China or in countries that haven’t existed in 30+ years.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Different years and countries were provided as examples of people on the left worshiping politicians.

                  What reason is there to believe that “The Left in the US in 2025” would be any different to what happened in other countries in other years?

              • fishy@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Man, these guys really just hated being associated with Stalin and Mao so much that they’re not picking up what you’re putting down. You’re correct, left wing movements can absolutely be led by authoritarians with a cult of personality. That said, I think most leftists view authoritarianism as something so abhorrent that they don’t associate those leaders with actual leftist policies.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Thanks for the understanding. Online discussion is usually so polarised that I suspect most people are assuming I’m attacking the left or defending the right.

                  I’m only highlighting lazy thinking.

      • Wolf@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nope. You can respect someone without worshiping them.

        I’m an anarchist so I wouldn’t even go so far as to say I respect Mao.

        Do I think Bernie and AOC are better than most politicians? Of course. If I found out they were sexual predators I’d still say throw them in jail.

        • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lenin’s body is literally preserved in a glass case for public viewing. That absolutely crosses the line into worshipping for me. That ain’t normal.

          • Wolf@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure, but was it the people who demanded that happen or was it the so-called communist government? By the time the U.S.S.R went away it had become sort of a landmark, so I can see why they didn’t get rid of it at that point.

            People in North Korea are required to have pictures of pictures of the Un’s on penalty of death. How they actually feel about him is anyone’s guess. Despite what they say he’s no leftist though at any rate.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe not you personally.

          I’m only highlighting that (some) people on the left are just as capable of blind worship as those on the right.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        The subject is worship, or maybe even “deify”, so no we fucking don’t.

        I guarantee if Bernie/AOC did 1% of the things Trump does, their support would evaporate. I know I personally would support their primary challengers…

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          AOC has 9 million followers. That’s quite a lot of worshipping.

          But, I’m not trying to compare to Trump, either in popularity or actions. I’m just saying the left does not have immunity against the cult of personality. The worshipping that has occurred on the right in the US has also occurred on the left in other countries.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Your definition of worship is weirdly loose. Like bizarrely loose. Following someone on Twitter, which is a weird thing to do in itself because why would you be on a Nazi website which says a lot about her I think, doesn’t mean you worship them. Do I worship windy.com because I’m subscribed to their weather app? Your neighbor says hi to you where they worshiping you? Oh I turned on the TV I was worshiping anything I’m watching. What just a completely ludicrous definition.

            The context here is conservatives who worship Donald Trump to the point where they build golden Idols for him. And you’re comparing getting alerts when someone post a message as the same thing. Wow

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s almost like… they’ve taken a different definition of the word to fit a narrative! But that can’t be right, they’re clearly discussing this in good faith!

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              My definition of worship is calibrated to Trump. It is liking someone for their personality, not their policies or actions.

              AOC is worshiped. Bernie less so. Obama a lot more so. However you define Trump worship, you can find (less extreme) parallels on the left.

              This is not criticism. The whole job of a politicians is to be worshiped, so that you are given the power to enact your policies.

              • njm1314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                It’s clearly not calibrated Trump. Because I’ve never seen anyone make a golden idol to Bernie Sanders. Obama hats and flags aren’t flying all over my neighborhood. Nobody bases their entire persona around Cortez. So if you’re calibrated to Trump your comparison is ridiculous.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tankies. For the first two you’re thinking of tankies. They’re not leftists, they’re commie-boos who simp for regimes they were lucky enough not to live through just because they’re anti-US and have the same oppression kink as the right-wing trolls.

      • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If AOC and Bernie were on the list, Dems would still say lock them up. Dems don’t care who is on the list, they want justice for it.

        Now Dems in Congress? That’s a different story. MAGA wants everyone to go down, but would happy glare over every single time Trump is mentioned. And you know that.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bernie’s not even a democrat. He ran as one because he needed a backing. Much like Trump isn’t a Republican, they just ate his shit up. He’s said the economy does better under Democrats, and ran for President under the Reform Party out of California before he realized the Republicans would support him more. The reform party was where Buchanan got all the KKK / white nationalist support back in the 90’s.

          A quote from Trump from the time that was telling. “It’s very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it.”

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          If AOC and Bernie were on the list, Dems would still say lock them up.

          I agree.

          Now Dems in Congress?

          No-one is worshiping them, but they seem happy to follow Trumps lead.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lenin, Mao Zedong

        No one in “the left” supports far right authorizations…

        The confusion may be you’re not aware far right authoritarians lie constantly, especially about what they support and why they support it

        • Wolf@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You might be confusing Lenin with Stalin.

          Stalin was the authoritarian, Lenin was more of a leftist who aimed to empower the working class and had a relatively more democratic and pragmatic point of view compared to Stalin. Lenin actually warned people about Stalin and advocated that he be removed from power.

          Not that I don’t have major issues with Lenin’s approach as well, but it was far better than Stalin and I believe he meant well at least.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lenin complained in his letters that[29] his bureaucratic “apparatus has already become gigantic — in some places excessively so — and under such conditions a “personal dictatorship” is entirely unrealizable and attempts to realize it would only be harmful.”[31] Loginov explains that Lenin attempted to compensate this “lack of real power” with either with “abundance of decrees” or “simply with strong words.”[29]

            The Bolsheviks also used terror as a means to dissuade unrest. On August 20, 1918 Lenin wrote to Nikolai Semashko, ‘I congratulate you on your energetic suppression of the kulaks and White Guards in the district. We must strike while the iron’s hot and not lose a minute, organize the poor of the district, confiscate all the grain and all the property of the rebellious kulaks, hang the kulak ringleaders, mobilize and arm the poor under reliable leaders out of our own unit, arrest hostages from among the wealthy and hold them.’[32]

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror

            Lenin wanted to be an authortarian and publicly complained his followers weren’t mobbing up to kill more people he politically disagreed with…

            So yeah, I stand by my comment.

            Lenin intentionally set the stage for Stalin, but would have done worse if he had the following.

            • Wolf@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Interesting I’ll look more into that. Admittedly I don’t have a super deep understanding of all the intricacies of that era and must have got some bad information.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                No worries.

                It was over a century ago and pretty much the only people who talk about him still are his worshippers.

                But as a general rule of thumb:

                Anyone that says they’re a socialist/communist while living in a palace and ordering their followers to mob up and kill people for disagreeing with their leader…

                They’re really a far right authoritarian

            • Vespair@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m glad you’re out here correcting people. I’m definitely a layman, but as I see it the entire concept of the Vanguard is immediately antithetical to communism, so I think Leninism is at best a bastardization of Marxist communism. Again, at least as far as my very uneducated opinion goes based on my understanding

              • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I know the chart you’re referring to, but we’re speaking in the context of US politics here. The wave function has collapsed to “right” = authoritarian and “left” = liberal. So, your original assertion presents the false equivalence that has allowed us to get to this current state.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The wave function has collapsed on the right to authoritarian but on the left people can still be either liberal or authoritarian.

                  Union leaders are left wing and are worshiped as authoritarians.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not all leftists are the same, mate. For example, anarchists would love to kill the Bolsheviks. Bolsheviks would just love to kill everyone. Look at the history of Spanish Republicans during the Spanish Civil War, then tell me if they did not even shoot at each other at any point.

        • agit68@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Bolsheviks would just love to kill everyone.

          Oh, and did they. Bolsheviks who spoke out about the abuses of the Bolsheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries (ya know, actual left wing communists), Anarchists (every stripe), Soviet delegates, workers who went on strike, the Kronstadt sailors (Heros of the Revolution), peasants who fought expropriations, you looked at me funny…

          The list is almost endless.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not all leftists are the same, mate.

          Exactly my point. Yet some here are claiming that no-one on the left will ever worship an authoritarian figure.

          I’m showing that some on the left already have.

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The Roosevelts are widely applauded by the US left, but they don’t really worship them, and many are ready to admit they are flawed. Teddy was an imperialist despite being progressive for the time. FDR was an improvement but the Japanese internment camp was a stain in his legacy.

                The communists would be more into cult of personality, but most American left are not communists and rightfully reject them.

      • pahlimur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I previously voted republican and was raised in the fox news soup. Its cult worship behavior that forces them to worship their leader. Its a big part of why it’s hard to move away from voting republican, they are all afraid of being cut out of the in group for disagreeing. None of that shit exists on the left, which is why they always argue about the basics.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          Totally agree with the first part. Cult worship can exist on the left but currently in the US it is highly localised (e.g. unions)

          • pahlimur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Are you actually this dumb? Or are you an LLM purposely trained to have a backwards training set?

              • pahlimur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                It’s literally one of the fundamental differences between like republican voters and likely democratic voters in the US. Democratic voters don’t change their opinions based on who is doing the thing, Republicans will always agree when their leaders do the thing and disagree when democrats do it.

                Semantics about, “oh it could exist”, are not worth discussing except in bad faith.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Democratic voters don’t change their opinions based on who is doing the thing

                  Oh, Democrats still do support hypocrisy. Just to a lesser extent.

                  E.g. Democratic voters are against insider trading, except when Nancy Pelosi does it. (For balance, insider knowledge about tariffs was 10x more profitable)

                  The current worshiped charismatic dictator is on the right, but there is absolutely no reason they couldn’t also emerge from the left with similar support.

                  E.g. Biden created the Patriot Act and it doesn’t get more authoritarian than that.

                  I’m not supporting “The Right” I’m saying what happened could equally happen on the left.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        LOL, no one in the US worships Lenin or Mao Zedong.

        The closest the left comes is with Bernie and that’s only on the internet.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          LOL, no one in the US worships Lenin or Mao Zedong

          People on the left have worshiped such people. Why should being a US citizen make that impossible.

          The closest the left comes is with Bernie and that’s only on the internet.

          Which is why I gave the example. Instead of a liberal Bernie, imagine an authoritarian Bernie with policies that captured some of the authoritarian loving MAGA crowd.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            At least the left’s brainless ship don’t worship politicians as the second coming of Jesus Christ son of god.

          • theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Oh yes they do. Lenin, Mao Zedong and (to a much lesser extent) AOC and Bernie.

            Just because the right easily attracts brainless sheep, that doesn’t mean the left can’t.

            Some can, yes. Some subset of any large enough population can reasonably be assumed to behave irrationally. Similarly, some authoritarian might somehow start following a left winger.

            Worship and submission to authority is, however, inherent to the supporting belief structure of the right. It’s how fascism works. The right, purely and simply, prefers to submit to authority. It’s why the evangelical, Orthodox, and other strict religious sects are always right leaning. They revel in the simplicity of it. They crave it and fantasize about it. They cherish the pain of those who have been blamed for their problems (because a scapegoat is much easier than thinking about it). They will keep it up until (and sometimes even through) the moment it eats their face. They’ll publicly deep throat that boot and beg daddy for the other one in gratitude for it also stomping on some scapegoat.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Worship and submission to authority is, however, inherent to the supporting belief structure of the right.

              A lazy assumption. Take a look at union leaders.

              It’s why the evangelical, Orthodox, and other strict religious sects are always right leaning.

              Hippy flower power Buddhists are considered left leaning. You can’t tie religious belief to right/left either.

              They cherish the pain of those who have been blamed for their problems (because a scapegoat is much easier than thinking about it).

              Yes, this is the authoritarian/nationalism part. Not the left/right or secular/religious part.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    The right considers Republican pedophiles good pedophiles, while the left considers all pedophiles vile. Enough of the double standards bullshit for the rich at the expense of children’s lives.

  • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    The cult has always assumed that everyone’s as bad as they are. That’s why they do the things that they do.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, investigate both. And if they’re guilty (which seems likely for both) throw both in jail!

      Though to be fair, Dump himself should go to jail even without any Epstein revelations, he’s done plenty else too

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, we (at least I) don’t prop up shitty people to save face, just because they’re on “my team” and I can’t admit I messed up–like basically every MAGA applogist.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I feel this encompasses my political universe.

    Trumpists: The Clintons are oligarch crooks! Arrest them!

    Me: Nods eagerly.

    Grads: The US is an imperialist menace! Shows horrific CIA ops.

    Me: Mmm hm. Seems like us, yyep.

    I’m a local ML enthusiast/tinker too, so:

    AI Haters: Sam Altman is a tech bro con artist! ChatGPT is evil and melting our brains!

    Me: Yep. Nods. Massive understatement, you have no idea.

    Yet I feel binned as a Neolib, US Apologizer and AI Bro. Which I am not.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      You have grasped at the very least the most basic understanding of the concept of Nuance, that’s how you’re able to reason.

      Those fucks don’t have any critical thinking skills.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        And scientific skepticism of one’s ‘tribe’.

        “Trump does no wrong; I trust him no matter what.” “None of these communist government incidents are real, or matter.” “All AI is offensive (or, the contrary, you’re a luddite for not believing in AGI).”

        It’s frustrating how absolute loyalty is such a cultural norm now, anything less is error. I even see it with some young folks really clinging to their favorite streamers.

        …I think that clouds a lot of judgement even if people are good critical thinkers. In fact, I think I read some study on how critical thinking tests nosedive when the subject is one’s own beliefs, and spike for the opposition.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s frustrating how absolute loyalty is such a cultural norm now

          Not sure if it was ever any different. Listen to some interviews from the 50s or read some newspapers from the late 1800s. Propaganda has never been any different than today. Tribalism was the same. It’s been pretty much always the case that the majority of the population thought in absolutes.

          The problem is you need to have a certain amount of intelligence, education, open-mindedness and humility to accept that things aren’t black and white and that no side has all the answers and all the truth. It’s much easier to just take one side completely and believe that the other side are pure daemons.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They understand that they’re being fucked over by those in power, but are completely blind to who’s doing it the worst and worship them instead.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        See, you say this, but (with all due respect, as I get the perspective), you might vehemently disagree with me asserting that “boycotting AI is playing right into tech bro’s hands.”

        So yes I agree with the irony, but I also feel like nuance and sub-arguments (from my perspective) get drowned out, too. Not every single Democrat politician is an oligarch, the US has done some good abroad, and using ML as a FOSS tool you own and host is not necessarily bad.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hope nobody who made fun of Trump for posting that AI picture of him with a red lightsaber, upvoted the meme depicting Leftists as Dr Evil…

    • jason@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump is an insecure man child and a clown for posting that AI lightsaber picture.

      Upvote

      Fuck him.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Obviously, we don’t really care about Bill Clinton, but I would like to bring up someone a lot of us will care about, and should still treat the same way.

    Marvin Minsky was a pioneer in the AI field. He also had ties to Epstein. Now, you may not care about Minsky or AI (though I’ll point out that the research field and what capitalism is doing with that research are very different things). But you might care about Richard Stallman, and he comes into this, too:

    https://www.npr.org/2019/09/17/761718975/free-software-pioneer-quits-mit-over-his-comments-on-epstein-sex-trafficking-cas

    The controversy swirling around him now stems from a series of emails from a CSAIL group email list–made public by Selam Jie Gano–in which Stallman said that a 17-year-old girl who allegedly was instructed by Epstein to have sex with AI pioneer Marvin Minsky likely seemed “entirely willing” to engage in the illegal act. He also argued it is unfair to call such an incident “sexual assault”.

    Stallman dropped out as president of the Free Software Foundation because of this.

    Minsky himself died in 2016, but as far as I’m concerned, Stallman got exactly what he deserved. There’s no evidence he was directly involved as far as I’m aware, but those are not acceptable comments to make, and he shows some deep misunderstandings of consent here.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Their angle is not “haha your guy will lose!” but had already shifted to "well your guy does it too so it’s ok you can’t accuse us of anything otherwise you’re a dirty hypocrite "

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which i always hate because he’s not “my guy”. He’s a politician that I voted for based on their policies. This isn’t a sports game.

    • tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I remember this with Elon Musk’s Nazi salute back in January. Even if the images of other politicians “doing it” hadn’t been taken grossly out of context, Musk still did it.

      • MoreZombies@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most of those are photos of a wave, which is what gets me. They say “Elon had a photo out of context just like these people!”

        And it’s like “No…it’s a video with the context very much kept and there are no illusions”