Get ready for the flood of kompromat

As Vladimir Putin sits thinking in his bomb-proof office, he may come to regret the fact that the entire world is sure that he ordered the death of the mutinous mercenary leader Yevgeny Prigozhin. The Kremlin is a Camorra, a mafia style parliament, running a gangster operation to fill Putin’s pockets and those of his oligarchs and elites. But as the Japanese found in Burma in 1944, if you prosecute a war with terror you will likely come unstuck against a well led, motivated and moral organisation like General ‘Bill’ Slim’s ‘Forgotten Army’.

Putin may in fact have signed his own death warrant. His fingerprints may not have been on the firing button when Prigozhin’s jet was brought down, and may not have been on the Polonium or Novichok which killed some of his other opponents, but his DNA is all over the orders. He now has two very powerful groups to worry about – quite apart from the International Criminal Court, which no doubt has so much evidence that if he ever gets to the Hague he will never leave.

Firstly, Putin must worry about his oligarchs who have now been holed up in their dachas in Moscow for over 18 months, unable to use their superyachts or villas in the Mediterranean. As their leader is further vilified around the globe over this latest murder, the oligarchs may come to see that their only chance to break out of Russia, now so diminished economically and socially, is to dispose of Putin.

Secondly, the Wagner Group might have lost their ‘cowboy’ leader and his deputy, but they remain a large force of thugs and murderers. Prigozhin was no military commander, but the Wagner Group is the most successful military outfit that Russia has managed to put into the field, no matter that they are paid mercenaries, many of them recruited out of Russian jails. To control such a rabble, you need some very hard ‘lieutenants’ running the show and these men will now be considering the future in Belarus and Africa. How ironic it would be if somebody showered them with riches to go and create mayhem within Russia. My experience of mercenaries is that they are not too picky about whose money they take.

archive link: https://archive.is/mMry3

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I read it. It seems like his highest ranking role was in chemical and biological hazard containment and management. He did see some action in the first gulf war, but it’s not clear to me his experiences with mercenaries then.

        He alluding to and projecting the knowledge of what a group of mercenaries will do in this situation. I think it’s highly speculative.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s enough for me to know that he has a long and distinguished career in the military, combat zones, and weapons design to allow him to make a casual comment like “in my experience, mercenaries will take anyone’s money.”

          This is not some bold claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you are mistaking fictionalized narratives around mercenary armies for how real mercenary armies act and behave.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That I should not speculate on the motives or incentives of groups that I don’t have direct experience with. It causes me to make assumptions that aren’t validated by reality.

                Edit: To be clear, I didn’t write the article. My bona fides don’t have any bearing on this because I’m not the one writing articles for the Telegraph suggesting I can predict the actions of mercenary groups. My read is that the author shouldn’t be speculating either (without providing additional information).

                • QHC@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re just doing the same thing in the opposite direction. Calling his take “fictional” is making a claim, not ‘just asking questions’.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You should probably pay a bit closer attention to his title and responsibilities during the invasion and occupation of Iraq, a war that used quite a lot of Wagner-style mercenaries

          So many, in fact, we don’t actually know how many died, because using disposable and desperate troops makes for cleaner official casualty reports.

          It’s okay to admit you made a bad assumption, fam, it’s definitely an understandable one.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            In 1991, he saw active service in Iraq with the 14th/20th King’s Hussars as part of the First Gulf War.[11]

            He was a captain in a British regiment during the first Gulf war. As far as I know no mercenary on either side of that conflict. I think he’s being highly speculative.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              K.

              Let me put it like this.

              The coalition invaded Iraq in 2003. “Looking for chemical weapons and nukes.”

              British troops would leave the occupation force in 2011.

              During that timeframe, what does his public page acknowledge him as doing, and what was he maybe doing before then, as a chemical warfare expert?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you make a claim like that you need to back it up with evidence. If it was that simple, the west could simply have covered Wagner’s costs and removed them from the engagement. That’s not how the real world works, at all.

        His Wikipedia shows no evidence of extraordinary experiences with mercenaries. It’s some basic on the ground service during the Gulf war as a captain and later being an officer in charge of hazmat management. In metaphor, working in a hospital doesn’t mean you are qualified to comment on aspects of open heart surgery, even if your job is also important.

    • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Prighozin was funding much of Wagner himself, for example.

      So, who is going to pay now that he’s dead?

      And that Russia’s young men are not coming home in boxes because they are just not coming home (Russia doesn’t want the bodies so as to avoid paying death benefits to families)

      I imagine these families will be happier and happier each day that goes by without having any information about their loved ones.

      But honestly, the biggest head scratcher here is the plain fact that mercenaries “to dispose of Putin” have been available forever

      But if Prigozhin was paying their fees and keeping them in check with his control structure how could they have been available to change their masters?

      I see your reply to the article as you see the article itself: full of speculations and assumptions but the main difference between the OP post and yours is that you are a nobody giving his opinion on the internet while the author of OP post was assistant director intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance for the HQ Land Command.

      Given the status I’m more inclined to listen to his speculations rather than yours, respectfully

        • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to equate a family not having a body with not having news of that soldier. But Ukraine has been collecting and identifying Russian bodies since the start of the war, and notifying families wherever possible. Many of the soldiers also have their own phones, and those phones have told the west a great deal about what is really going on behind Russian lines. Yet you seem sure that none of those soldiers would use their phones to speak of deaths within the unit. Interesting take.

          You seem to forget that, following the bombing caused by a massive presence of phone signals in a single spot, Russia has been much more careful in letting its trooper use their cellphones. Beside that I imagine a family not having any news from his relatives at the front would be anxious for their loved ones and would start asking questions, even if it meant facing criminal charges. Ukraine can identify a portion of the bodies from the battlefield I imagine, and they would be able to reach the families of an even small percentage I reckon.

          LOL. Think that over a bit and get back to me. Seriously.

          I’ve thought about it and I really can’t see who can pay Wagner’s operators salaries, let alone arming them according to their standards (much better than the Russian army ones, can we agree on that?).

          As far as I know Russia pays its soldiers 300-400€ a month and Wagner mercenaries are paid circa 2k (those who are not serving instead of being in a cell). Prigozhin was capable of providing for Wagner through his affairs in Africa and through the money he got from the Kremlin, will Putin be able to substitute such an income? What will happen if not? I’ve got my answers but they are just hypotheticals, who will live will see.

          True enough. But that does not make either of us an expert on Russian affairs. His article does make one of us a fantasy writer, though.

          He certainly knows Wagner better than you since he probably met them on the battlefield.

          Works for me, lol. It’s just an opinion, and everyone’s got one.

          But it helps, when forming an opinion, to acquaint oneself with all available fact first. And to be completely honest, you didn’t even spot the most questionable opinion in my post. (Hint: Who is Sergei Shoigu?) But keep working on it, because as far as I’m concerned the more people that are interested in the subject as whole, whether right or wrong, the better.

          Thank you for taking the time to state your disagreement.

          No problems, it’s a pleasure to have a conversation about these thematics since there is always to learn about any subject. In this sense, who is Sergei Shoigu? What I know about him is that he is a Putin sycophant only good as a yes man and coming from a political career scarcely linked to any military activity. Am I missing any information about the man?

    • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is one of those “we want another news story but we don’t actually have new info so let’s just do a weird take on old news” articles.

    • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wagner was never a “pure” independent mercenary corporation. They were created, funded, and indirectly controlled by the Russian government to interfere in foreign conflicts to advance Russia’s goals while maintaining plausible deniability for the Kremlin. We can be sure that the Kemlin’s appountees are now stepping into leadership roles of Wagner. The question is whether Wagner will be disbanded or rebranded (salvaged and reconstituted) by Putin.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prighozin’s death is international news, but noone gives a single fuck outside the spectacle of it. The man was loved by noone outside Russia, Putin has transparently murdered dozens of people far more important to the West without being toppled.

    Russia’s newly displayed military impotence shifts the calculus, but Prighozin isn’t the guy to cause an international uproar.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the bigger point is that now Wagner may very well decide that he’s the enemy.

      Given the fact that all they needed to do is wander over in the general direction of Moscow and it causes absolute chaos, if they actually had a mind to invade I think they’d win in 10 minutes.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what is worse, a sociopath with nukes or the Wagner lunatics with nukes…

        Putting our hopes on those monsters to help bring down Putin will end badly. It smells of the US propping up Bin Laden to kick the Russians out of Afghanistan.

        Short-term gain, with massive long-term consequences.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The difference in this case is that no one’s helping Wagner. It’s one set of monsters taking down another set of monsters. Entirely on their own because they’re utterly disorganised.

          But one of those situations is slightly better than the other. At the very least it will weaken Russia and force them to pull military forces out of Ukraine.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wagner with nukes because they’re an unknown element when it comes to nukes. We at least know that Putin is reluctant to use them.

    • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Putin has transparently murdered dozens of people far more important to the West without being toppled.

      Russia’s newly displayed military impotence shifts the calculus, but Prighozin isn’t the guy to cause an international uproar.

      That isn’t however the argument the article is making (noting I’m rather dubious on it).

      They’re not arguing that NATO will suddenly invade because Pringles got SAM’d.

      They’re arguing that a) the Wagner lieutenants are competent and experienced which makes it likely that they are not only capable but likely to be effective at seeking vengeance; and b) that Putin has systematically culled all the competent generals and hence there’s a reduced capability.

      Now I’m dubious on the likelihood of the first, and while the second is true I’m not as convinced it will be a game changer.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah - though I’ve got no idea whether they were complicit Wagner stooges or largely innocent wagies.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with the sentiment, but find that legality (the basis for it being extrajudicial or not) is a poor marker of morality that varies based on the laws of the country in question - for example: In the absence of a formal declaration of war, I think every invading Russian soldier killed by a Ukrainian is technically an extrajudicial killing (though in practical terms, if course a conviction won’t be sought). Morally, I think they have the right to defend themselves against an invading army that seeks to annex them.

            Anyhow, I think we’re effectively in agreement and splitting hairs way off-topic, so I’m going to dip. Be well!

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    As their leader is further vilified around the globe over this latest murder

    What a weird thing to say. Killing some high-level war criminals was a public service. It’s all the many thousands of other people tortured and killed because of Putin that I’m upset about.

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck? Is this what journalism is reduced to nowadays? Just posting some ramblings of a person whose knowledge on the subject is limited to reading only the headlines from some cherry-picked sources? At this point, they’d be better of just publishing completely random tweets, as they would have more useful info than this.

  • elouboub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My experience of mercenaries is that they are not too picky about whose money they take.

    Who’s going to pay them to kill Putin? Most likely not the EU, nor China, but maybe maybe maybe the US. However that wouldn’t go over well with their war industry as a longer war in Ukraine means more money. It would have to be some private billionaire who’s hurt so much by the war that he (and maybe his friends) decide that Putin is costing them more money than it would cost to dispose of him.

    • jantin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the oligarchs. It’s quite likely that top people at Wagner are/were rubbing shoulders with some of the Russia’s rich so there may be more for the mercs in it than just the money.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who’s going to pay them to kill Putin? Most likely not the EU, nor China, but maybe maybe maybe the US. However that wouldn’t go over well with their war industry as a longer war in Ukraine means more money. It would have to be some private billionaire who’s hurt so much by the war that he (and maybe his friends) decide that Putin is costing them more money than it would cost to dispose of him.

      Exactly. This is pure speculation on the part of the author, and not backed up by anything.

    • xNIBx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Noone in the West wants Putin dead because his replacement will be even more hardcore. Every potential replacement candidate, people with real power, are bigger hawks than Putin. We might see Russia do a full conversion to war economy or some nukes flying.

    • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wagner has always been funded by the Kremlin. The money was laundered by passing through Prigozhin’s hands.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Finally! A feel-good story of hope. Throughout history, conservative leaders like Putin have thrived on oppressing the vulnerable while grifting conservative masses. It’s always a delight to watch them burn.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know. I think he made the right move from a personal life extension standpoint. I wouldn’t kill the head of the world’s 2nd or 3rd biggest mercenary group but I just like hiking and cooking and reading at home. If someone came for me, I’d probably be like, “Ok, well, let’s get better at throwing kitchen knives in case this is serious.”

    Putin has a way different life than me but I try to be empathetic. Being in charge of a whole mafia seems tough. Maybe we should cut him a little slack.

  • StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a shit opinion piece. Every other word is just some attempt at making the piece more inflammatory. The whole article doesn’t say a single useful thing the entire time.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean JFK could have been struck by a micrometeorite or very fast moving bee. What if?

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same way as it’s surprising how careless enemies of the Russian state tend to be when standing near high windows.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I mean really. Fall from window, plane crash, and poisoning seem to be the big assassination methods. They should always be regarded with extra suspicion.

    • Papercrane@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then still everyone thinks that Putin did it. There is no way to know. I think even the US said that it was an accident

      • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US only said it didn’t have any evidence it was caused by a missile… which should be read as we don’t want to acknowledge our information gathering network has info about this incident so we saw nothing 😉

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          We do know that the civilian radar in the area was jammed 30 seconds before the plane started pinwheeling. And that the plane was pinwheeling, which is most commonly seen in missile strikes.

    • BOMBS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      then Putin shouldn’t have been committing political assassinations for decades

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t really matter if it was or wasn’t. I’m sure no one in Wagner is believing that and their beliefs are what matter here.