• REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      And bunch of other sacrifices. One of the points was also about everyone living in a city close by. The study is not applicable to real life, it’s utopia scenario. One of the biggest problems isn’t even resources, but co2 production.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I dunno, I think it would be perfectly doable with good public transit.

        Don’t have many big cities, but have mid-sized cities near-ish, and smaller towns near the mid-sized ones. A sort of ‘web’ of cities, if you will.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          what you’re describing is called “multigrid” system.

          you have grids of varying size, all overlapping each other.

          examples:

          notice the streets make some kind of “grid” on the landscape

              • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s awesome, thanks!

                And honestly, I could see this sort of systems being handy - having raillines between the big and mid-sized cities, and bus services for the aforementioned + small cities and towns, and (electric) bicycles for the rest.