• fer0n@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s more fitting. It’s a miss on Steve Jobs though. For one he didn’t kill himself, cancer did. And for another, just because he could be a prick doesn’t make him a bad person worth killing.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He had a very treatable cancer that was found in the early stages and was given an excellent prognosis, but in his infinite megalomaniac manner he decided he knew better than the doctors and opted to treat his cancer at home with homeopathic remedies. His home made new age “cures” clearly didn’t work and by the time he finally decided to get proper treatment his cancer had metastasized and he was beyond help… sounds to me like he played a large hand in his own demise so the joke plays.

      • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I get what you’re saying. It’s still something entirely different to bomb yourself to death vs. to not do enough to stop a disease. And even with all the haters in here, I don’t think any reasonable person would want Steve Jobs dead, it’s not like he murdered people.

          • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sure, if you say so. On a different note, I recently watched Paradise on Netflix, where you can basically live forever if you’re rich enough. In the background someone says on tv at one point something like “the climate crisis has been solved by the top 5 richest people”, which made me laugh quite a bit.

            • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tbf the top 5 richest people could do theoretically do a lot to solve the climate crisis, but it would mean ceasing to be the top 5 richest people, and I’m disillusioned of them ever doing so voluntarily

              • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I found it funny because it’s probably true. And since they live forever in the movie they were motivated to fix the planet for themselves. Not sure if that came across, but that’s what I meant.

                • jarfil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The key to fixing the climate crisis, is to make top billionaires immortal…

                  Somehow, it gives me pause and makes me think which one’s worse.

        • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He did nothing to stop the disease and actively rejected treatment and advice from medical professionals because he thought he knew better. So while this isn’t the same as actively killing oneself, he is still more than likely responsible for his own death due to his own actions (or inaction).

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Getting a treatable cancer and then choosing to do nothing about it other than eat fruit and refuse proper medical care is tantamount to killing yourself IMO.