• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    8 days ago

    ‘Make this chat discoverable.’ Beneath that, in smaller, lighter text, was a caveat explaining that the chat could then appear in search engine results."

    UX designer here. People don’t read the little gray supporting text. “Search Engine” should’ve been in the headline.

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    the ignorance required to lean into ‘AI’ in such a way all but ensures this

    it’s pretty telling that I hear AI talked about and seemingly used most by conservative types, I imagine because it’s being pushed by influencers in that realm and the same people bankrolling ‘AI’ everywhere. people that are already comfortable with blind faith… makes a bit of sense

    then you still have people who are used to challenging and questioning things still upholding skepticism and not trusting ai because it all reeks of shit

    AI for next pope!

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      That and conservatives abhor thinking. They need someone or something to defer to. And LLMs can give them all sorts of moderately intelligent bullshit they’ve come to expect . From their leaders and politicians. But better and faster. With possibly even less accuracy.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Apparently these people ticked a box saying “allow this chat to be indexed by search engines” and were surprised when their chats were indexed by search engines?

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I remember seeing the check box option appear to directly index to google, this explains why I can’t find it anymore.
          I tried searching unique things in my shared text and couldn’t find any of them on the goog

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well I’m shocked more people don’t ignore the flashing lights at train stations and just drive into the tracks right in front the trains frankly.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      unrelated but kinda related - I’m a firefighter. Often seen folks driving toward the scene lights like moths. Can be sketchy sometimes. I suspect it’s the collimated leds just piercing into the brains of the already distracted drivers.

  • C1pher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Seems like a skill issue to be honest. Bunch of boomers checking boxes they dont understand, since thats entirely optional thing to create. Those public links arent created by themselves.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Says in the article the users clicked “share chat” then shared the links with others on services like What’s App.

    Sounds like What’s App should get some flack for this too.

    • BangCrash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Its one thing to not be private. Its an entirely different thing for that thing to be crawled, indexed and published on the world’s biggest catalogue

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yep, and when you click a button that liteally says “make this discoverable on search engines” which is off by defualt, its the later.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        When it’s chats with LLMs trained on this very type of data, it’s mostly the user’s fault. Of course, executives of LLM companies should still rot in prison.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s totally avoidable if you don’t use it, but I think the onus is mostly on the companies for advertising these chat bots as like, a friendly personal assistant when that’s absolutely not what they are. Like all “AI” shit, it runs mostly on consumer deception.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    how are they shocked, when they also get blog posts, and other posts being summarized on the AI search?