Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1653arrow-down19
arrow-up1644arrow-down1external-linkI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldPope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squarePope-King Joe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoSomeone with more discipline than I have, that’s for sure.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 months agoIf I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
minus-squareddplflinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoI’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoI’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
minus-squarePope-King Joe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoI’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.
Someone with more discipline than I have, that’s for sure.
If I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
I’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
I’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
But that’s less obvious I think
I’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.