Google will ask all Android developers to verify their identity starting next year.

  • mrbn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds to me like this is a workaround so that Google can maintain control over who gets to release apps now that they can’t do it by locking the apps behind Google Play. I wouldn’t be surprised if being verified also includes some kind of fee.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I will be purchasing a phone that runs free open source Linux. This whole Android thing sucks ass.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fascist US obviously won’t do shit, but Europe ought to outlaw this blatant anti-trust violation.

          • INeedMana@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The way I understand what /e/OS is, it sounds like it should be able to not include this check

            • 反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Unfortunately, as I still type, there’s no liberated deblobbed ROM. /e/OS, like every custom AOSP fork, is dependent on leaks &/manufacturer provided ROMs. After Google silos AOSP ROMs, all forks will not be able to acquire updates downstream.

              Linux Phones, are not alternatives.

              • INeedMana@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                But if the forks are able to tear out the gapps, shouldn’t this “cert” check go with it? I understand that the check would have to be in the installer app. Even if it’s a part of launching mechanism, it should also be possible to tear it out

                Linux Phones, are not alternatives.

                I’m sorry, I don’t follow. AFAIK GRUB did not need to get some blessing to get installed on UEFI. So Linux Phones should be free of big tech gatekeeping. This exchange we are having here is on technology community, not privacy (where I would get your point)

  • mormund@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Will just F-Droid have to do this or any app developer? If it’s the latter, I guess might as well go with an unofficial OS…

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      If the phone ships with Play Store, Play Services, and other Google Mobile Services (GMS) apps the requirement will be enforced, it doesn’t matter which source you use to get your apps. They claim to provide an exception for “student projects”, but per their post, it’s yet to be created.

      • mormund@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Welp I guess Android and iOS are becoming more alike. Just not in the direction I’d have liked.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If this goes through, I’ll move from my S23 Ultra to a flipphone the moment it gets outdated, and also build some portable computing device from a Raspberry Pi CM.