• LoafyLemon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I believe the use of the death penalty in severe cases isn’t driven by vengeance; it’s more about preventing the individual from causing harm to others in the future. It’s important to recognize that not all criminals can be successfully rehabilitated, such as psychopaths or serial killers.

    However, if the death penalty were to exist, I believe it should be carried out by the person who pronounces the verdict personally. This would ensure that such a grave decision is not made lightly.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could you not prevent them from causing additional harm by not killing them? What if you’re wrong? There’s plenty of reason to leave them alive, but only one real reason to kill them, and that reason is vengeance.

      • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you familiar with how the psychopathic mind functions? They lack empathy, and I don’t mean it in a pejorative sense, no, I mean it literally.

        Psychopaths are hard to reason with due to their lack of aforementioned empathy, manipulative nature, impulsivity, shallow emotions, and absence of remorse.

        If they killed once, they will kill again.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am. And there are plenty of ways to keep them from killing people aside from killing them. There’s plenty of people serving life sentences for murder.