• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Less. Look at any Lockpicking Lawyer video on YouTube as he demonstrates in real time how bad they are. Most of his videos are under 5 min

    If you want to really turn yourself off smart locks check out any DefCon talk about smart locks or “smart” devices in general.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And most dumb locks can also be picked in under 5 minutes. The difference is a smart lock can alert me when someone who isn’t me opens the door or leaves it open. Of course, most burglars are just going to break a window to get in.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        There should be a separation between fully mechanical locks with electronic monitoring (ideal) and a mechanical lock with vital electronic components.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can get a lot of locks which allows you to connect external mechanisms which can do just that. Don’t know anything ready out of the box, though

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, he is a better picker than most would-be robbers, so pretty much all his videos are short.

      That being said, the weak point he shows tends to be that the companies focus so much on the tech that they throw in a crappy backup lock, which make many rudimentary security mistakes, and make them easy to crack for even a novice.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right at the start dude….

          Designed for administration of high occupancy.

          Those are second line in those cases, that’s not supposed to go on someone’s front door…

      • maporita@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A previous owner of my apartment had for some reason installed a high security door. It’s 5 inches thick with steel plates inside and has 3 separate sets of 3 locking rods like a bank vault. Not sure what line of work they were in but, really, good luck to the person who thinks they can break in here easily. Downside is there is no way to put a digital lock on the sucker.

          • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Firefighters train for exactly such scenarios and will happily go through a nearby wall. The cops struggle with armored doors, but the guys with axes don’t bother.

      • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You want them to break in for insurance purposes though, it’s a clear indication of unauthorized entry. Your policy should cover the door/window, but if your lock gets picked/bypassed you’re going to have a rough time getting things covered.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My smart lock doesn’t change the locking mechanisms. It’s basically a robot on the inside that turns the lock like you would. The only security issue would have to be software side, which a typical thief isn’t going to bother with especially since you cost tell from the outside that’s it’s not a normal lock - because it is.

      August lock btw.

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree that most thieves won’t bother - but they do now have the additional option to hack it, making the lock less secure in total, not to mention the flawed mechanical design many of those smart locks have.

        • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I’m just saying in my case they have no way of seeing that it’s a smart lock at all. The only smart part is an attachment on the interior side. So mechanically it’s 100% the same, and there is no visible indication that is “hackable,” even if it were. My door and it’s lock look as just like it did 15 years ago.

    • malloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      most of the smart locks that are supposed to be drop in replacements for traditional locks are mostly trash.

      Personally been eyeing upgrading to UI’s access readers, but it lacks features like door unlock with Apple Homekey (for now anyways since it requires some specialty hardware). So been holding off.

      This particular product is geared towards small business and large enterprises. But can be setup for home usage if you have to technical expertise.