BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Google won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down14cross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@beehaw.orggoogle@lemdro.id
arrow-up1209arrow-down1external-linkGoogle won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@beehaw.orggoogle@lemdro.id
minus-squaresorghum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up98·2 个月前There wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
minus-squarePumpkin Escobar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·2 个月前I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 个月前This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
minus-squareBetaDoggo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 个月前To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.
There wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.
This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.