• Dreeg Ocedam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      If the only thing they have is an IP address it is much less info than the actual phone number of who sent the message. It can also be very easily prevented by using a VPN or the built-in anti censorship proxy.

        • chiefstorm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Not to point out the obvious, but if someone uses a burner phone to initially setup their signal account, that is another big layer of privacy

            • chiefstorm@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Oh shit, well I had no idea. Hell, I know in China you used to easily get a burner number, but now it is restricted… Well listen, that certainly changes the conversation.

              Do you know if there are any pay-as-you-go phone plans in Europe ?

        • Dreeg Ocedam@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          they still also know when a specific client with a specific phone number connects to their network

          I don’t think so. I didn’t really fully understood how sealed sender worked until now and only trusted Signal to implement it properly. I’m currently reading this which explains how it works and it seems to provide similar guaranties to what I assumed. The server can only have the IP of the sender. There seem to be some issues, but it’s not as trivial as you seem to think it is. They may also have implemented the mitigations since.