Dessalines@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years agoDessalines - Why not Signal?dessalines.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up167arrow-down17cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.ml
arrow-up160arrow-down1external-linkDessalines - Why not Signal?dessalines.github.ioDessalines@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years agomessage-square109fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.ml
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 years agoThat simply means that development isn’t out in the open. Why would you not push branches and do code reviews out in the open for an ostensibly open source project?
minus-squareᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 years ago That simply means that development isn’t out in the open Correct. FOSS doesn’t mean they have to develop it out in the open, only that they have to release the code for everyone else’s benefit. Why would you not push branches and do code reviews out in the open for an ostensibly open source project Because open source simply means the code is available. You’re not forced to interact with anyone else just because something is open source.
That simply means that development isn’t out in the open. Why would you not push branches and do code reviews out in the open for an ostensibly open source project?
Correct. FOSS doesn’t mean they have to develop it out in the open, only that they have to release the code for everyone else’s benefit.
Because open source simply means the code is available. You’re not forced to interact with anyone else just because something is open source.