CERN’s BASE collaboration achieved a breakthrough in antimatter research by maintaining an antiproton in a quantum superposition between spin states for nearly 50 seconds - marking the first-ever demonstration of an antimatter qubit[1].

Using electromagnetic Penning traps, researchers controlled a single antiproton to oscillate smoothly between spin “up” and “down” states, like pushing a playground swing in perfect rhythm[1:1]. This coherent quantum control allows for testing fundamental physics theories with unprecedented precision.

The achievement enables 10-100 times more accurate measurements of antiproton magnetic moments[1:2], helping investigate why matter dominates over antimatter in the universe - a key mystery in physics. According to BASE spokesperson Stefan Ulmer, “This represents the first antimatter qubit and opens up the prospect of applying the entire set of coherent spectroscopy methods to single matter and antimatter systems in precision experiments”[1:3].

A new system called BASE-STEP will transport trapped antiparticles to magnetically calmer environments. Lead author Barbara Latacz notes this could extend spin coherence times “maybe even ten times longer than in current experiments, which will be a game-changer for baryonic antimatter research”[1:4].


  1. CERN - A quantum leap for antimatter measurements ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Had a thought the other day that the antimatter in the early universe might have ended up in direct collapse black holes. Evidence seems to be mounting up that supermassive black holes come from the early universe. If that is true I find it logical that in the black holes one type of matter dominated randomly. And then there was a little bit more matter than antimatter left in the universe.

    The black holes shouldn’t care about the collected matter and antimatter annihilating. The energy won’t escape either way.

    i wish I had the energy to really think this through or see if there are any papers on that idea.

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Interesting idea, but my brain is too small at this hour. Andi gave me an answer which may help

      Based on the provided context, while an intriguing idea, there’s no direct evidence that primordial antimatter ended up in direct collapse black holes. However, the asymmetry between matter and antimatter in our universe may be explained through evolutionary selection at the universe level.

      According to physicist Matt Strassler, “any universe containing a great deal of matter AND antimatter should be far less reproductively successful than one containing only one or the other”[1]. This is because matter/antimatter annihilation, while theoretically 100% efficient at converting mass to energy, would not provide an evolutionary advantage compared to black hole production.

      The early universe appears optimized for direct collapse black hole formation, with the James Webb Space Telescope revealing evidence of supermassive black holes forming very early through direct collapse of smooth gas clouds[2]. These observations show the mass balance in early galaxies tilted heavily toward supermassive black holes rather than stars.


      1. Matter and Energy: A False Dichotomy - Matt Strassler ↩︎

      2. AMA September 2025 - Sean Carroll ↩︎