Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agonot hard rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square371fedilinkarrow-up1455arrow-down113
arrow-up1442arrow-down1external-linknot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square371fedilink
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoLibertarian on its own it just means opposition to authority; both have a similar chance of believing in what you said
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-22 months agoLibertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
minus-squareabbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoThis ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoTrue, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.
Libertarian
on its own it just means opposition to authority; both have a similar chance of believing in what you said
Libertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
This ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
True, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.