TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 10 days agoIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1116arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1115arrow-down1external-linkIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteTribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 days agoAlso, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument. If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 days agoExactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoNo, that would be an and hominem.
Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument.
If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
No, that would be an and hominem.