Maybe I’m crazy, but I feel like gamblers have a heavy right lean.

Edit - Oops: https://midwest.social/post/18205923?scrollToComments=true

That was a wild read. Glad you’re still around.

Yeahhhhh my wife was on the fence about getting a CPAP for years. Finally got one and it dramatically helped! Until suddenly she got sick. And stayed sick until she stopped using it. Turns out it was the model you described and little shitty foam bits are not good for your lungs. Needless to say, she has not used any CPAP since. It sucks because even she said it helped, but she’s too scared of getting sick again to try a different kind.

Thanks medical capitalism!

Shouldn’t the glock be pointed the other way if it’s going to cause a coma?

Bollywood Zoids, do it

Saved you a click: In a lab.

Drow matriarchs be like:

Clarifying question because your comment could be interpreted in two ways. Did you mean:

1. “It all makes sense now because women are hysterical” or
2. “It all makes sense now because of course the Trump team would bully and slander a woman”

Had a great deal of fun with this one and it’s still getting updates!

I feel like:

1. No race should have alignment locking in any direction, because people are people and can do whatever they want. Our goodness or badness isn’t determined by our genes.
2. But, people are who they are because of the society they grow up in and how people treat them. If humans treat goblins like shit because they’re goblins, and a goblin turns into a big bad because they want to kill the humans that slaughtered their village, then that villain is interesting for reasons tied to their species.

“No villain in D&D is interesting for reasons tied to their species” sounds very dangerously close to “I’m race-blind” in terms of not acknowledging that different people have different struggles, and racism is often a huge part of those struggles.

NGL I assumed ‘Tanning’ meant tanning hides, not a tanning booth.

All I’m hearing is “So that means my character has to jack-o pose all the time!”

A thousand good experiences won’t outweigh one bad one, and this meme / discourse proves it. A woman can interact with a thousand good men, and all it takes is one fucking rapist and now all men are evil, all men are untrustworthy, all men are literally less dangerous than a wild rabid animal. There’s no point.

How is the appropriate answer not to just kill yourself because no matter what you do, you’re going to be scaring someone just for existing?

I feel like a product of a bygone era that should just…not exist anymore. Existing as a ‘good man’ doesn’t do any good.

Is there a way to GPO this ‘feature’ off? Worried about some of our users getting confused.

Don’t create the torment nexus.

Major moral panic about trans people leading to violence, institutionalized discrimination and death = no reason?

If you don’t get bullied for your name, you’ll just get bullied for something else. At least with the name you can blame it on your parents, maybe. Kids are assholes.

Okay, but Raddix Zephyr and Leviathan are fucking cool names. Sigurd Felix Wolfgang Atreides could be if you split it among like, two kids instead of one.

Stress in animals leads to worse tasting meat, to the point that it heavily affects the meat industry. There’s probably better sources but this was what I found quickly: https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/why-scared-animals-taste-worse