that’s what this post is, but it’s not what caused the ban

having multiple fediverse accounts is not bannable, and ad hominem is itself bad faith. calling it out is not.

Removed by mod

they said fight, not hope

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

but we don’t know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it’s an interesting theory and we can test it!!

it’s intentionally vague. build an affinity group and assess your capabilities.

your assertion isn’t that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.

ok well if you don’t have any evidence I’m going to dismiss your conclusion.

I didn’t say they are. but these options are not effective.

and yet they did not actually suggest any direct actions

I don’t care for your dehumanization

please run the experiment with a sufficient sample size and let me know the results.

i didn’t think you were, I’m lampooning people who think their thimble is meaningful.

if everyone who disagree with you is a bot, you must live in a lonely world.

prove that another billionaire would take their place. this is a serious hypothesis that we can test, but the conclusion is not foregone.

oh fuck. yeah. no way they should be in an anarchist community anyway.

they are not a safe person. their pattern of “investigating” other users is toxic as fuck.

not too mention their conspiratorial “everyone is a trump supporter in sheep’s clothing” accusations every time they find a principaled disagreement.

fuck them.

someone else might also have a thimble! then you two can feel smug together.