I have an io10. It is not worth it. The 3D Tracking does not work reliable for me. The cleaning result seem to be good, but you can get that from a cheaper model too. io6 or something. The new brush heads are expensive, but good imho. Also the app only works for one person, sharing with different brushes does not work. Battery is not replaceable. Won’t buy again.

You might like to watch: https://youtu.be/BKorP55Aqvg

deleted by creator

Here, fixed that for you:

Where did you come from, where did you go? Where did you come from, Cotton-Eye Joe?

https://youtu.be/mOYZaiDZ7BM

That’s in Victoria Park, isn’t it? How cool is that.

Yes, there’s the jam and above even some confiture. That’s bananas!

https://freefilesync.org/

Im Prinzip richtig, nur hat halt niemand eine TAN erwogen ausser Dir gerade. Und den Grund hast Du ja auch gerade geliefert: bringt nicht so viel

Es wäre sinnvoller einem authentifizierten User ausschliesslich Zugriff auf seine Daten zu geben.

Genau. Sofern nicht anderweitig geschützt. Das ist das Problem, nicht die fortlaufende ID. Persönliche Daten hinter einer zufälligen ID zu verstecken statt hinter einem Zugriffsschutz ist “security by obscurity”. Man kann immer noch mit Brute-Force die Daten bekommen. Der Zugriff ist immer noch möglich, nur dauert er eventuell länger.

Richtig wäre es gewesen jedem Link eine eindeutige Kennung zuzuordnen, die nur Zugriff auf die relevanten IDs hat.

Dieser Spinn “oh, ein Fehler, die IDs waren fortlaufend, passiert schon mal” verdeckt die beiden tatsächlichen Probleme:

• Zugriff auf persönliche Daten ohne Authentifizierung
• Unzulässige Erhebung von personenbezogenen Daten

Was ist denn das Problem mit einer fortlaufenden ID?

I can afford not to have a watch.

This is just stolen from a Terry Prachett Novel.

Me neither. Please explain. Something with mushrooms, surely.

I’m a very experienced software developer. I’ve tried a lot of “AI” tools and they are just a waste of time. You can use ChatGPT as some kind of search engine, but it fails utterly with more complex tasks and code bases. It’s a bit like answers on stackoverflow. Sometimes a bad solution got the highest vote and you find a suitable approach for your problem on page 2. You need experience to understand the difference. AI tools for coding were also trained on hobby code bases, tutorials and such. You can see that in the output. It’s missing input validation, error handling, patterns etc.

Sure you can “discuss” with AI to add those features, but frankly its faster to just write it yourself. (For production ready code, a POC might be ok)

So if someone shows up claiming he wants to solve my “unsolveable” problems with AI I think they are not qualified enough to understand that they probably won’t. Also if an AI tool could do it why would I need them?

The rest of the resume is also just unspecific. It seems he knows Javascript, as far as I recall. Seems to do frontend and graphics. But I have no idea which frameworks he knows or what was his actual task in these projects. (I just skimmed over the text, this is what I recall. I might be wrong about it)

Finally the whole context: AI stole my job -> I want a job where I can use AI So apparently he says AI can do his job, which means for me: not qualified

Please remember: my very personal opinion, based on a 2 minute research. Could be very wrong and biased.

From his resume:

Goals I am looking to be part of a small-to-midsized engineering team where I can have real impact by solving hard and previously unsolvable problems by leveraging AI tools.

I would also not hire him. I’m not really familiar with US resume culture, but the whole thing is very unappealing to me. Also from his linked substack, I get unpleasant vibes.

And he still does not know the difference between taxes and tariffs and who’s gonna pay them.

Removed by mod

Looks like Pikachu now.

Have a look: https://www.make-it-in-germany.com/en/visa-residence/types/job-search-opportunity-card

I first read: …made kids disappear Read too much about a certain country lately I guess…